Thank you!
Why not comment rather than downvote? This community is about in-depth discussion, that's probably why they prefer comments to downvotes
Thank you!
think we should be able to have healthy and constructive debates/discussions about both without any instance-wide restrictions.
Maybe that could be the topic for another governance vote
UM used to post conservative articles in the past
- Breitbart article: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/29398787
- Discussion about it from a month ago https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/46576874/19393763
Allegedly, it was to "post political posts of all angles to that sub, including conservative articles", but some people interpreted this as trolling/sea lioning
I knew by asking the question we would get into the Bluesky components questions 😅
Let's say tomorrow the feddit.uk team decides to self host a PDS provider.
Is it possible for the feddit.uk team to ban someone, or can that only be done by Bluesky? Would that ban be federated to other PDS providers?
Edit: I feel like Bluesky has the same issue than the Fediverse has with federated bans and alts, but because everybody uses Bluesky's centralized components, nobody notices.
Off topic: I forgot how the governance system works, can someone link the post where it was implemented because I’m on mobile and search is really hard here. I don’t know how to see my vote tallied. ___
Upvote or downvote the main post
Seems like at least the first issue has been fixed 20 minutes ago: https://piefed.zip/post/223804#comment_512392
Seems to be related: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/48662871