requiring JS makes sense on some sites, namely those that act more like web apps that let you do stuff (like WhatsApp
I mean yes, but Whatsapp is a bad example. It could easily use no JavaScript. In the end it's the same as Lemmy or any other forum. You could post a message, get a new page with the message. Switching chats is loading a new page. Of course JavaScript enhances the experience, makes it more fluid, etc, but messengers could work perfectly fine without JavaScript.
Rekt.webm
There's a difference though between counteracting the spread of a disease and looking at porn...
A lot of men have 0 sex, so you saying you have low sex drive still gives them more than 0 sex. But they would be settling for your amount of sex. If someone else can give them more, they will take that. And probably a lot of people have more sex drive than you. So they will entertain you while they have no other options, but as soon as an option with more sex drive opens up, they are dropping you.
You have to look specifically for people that don't really want/need sex, it is your obligation to figure that out.
Dating in general is a numbers game, you have to go through a lot of people to get what you want. But you have to know what you want and actively filter for it, if like right now, it seems you basically entertain everything who is friendly to you, you will have a lot of the other side canceling, not you canceling.
To this I want to add personally, death is a normal part of life. If it's because of old age or humans killing each other doesn't make incredibly much of a difference to me. As long as life existed there was death & suffering. Of course I'm against unnecessary death & suffering. But I'm asking myself, why would I myself add to the suffering by suffering when I see others suffer and I can only very barely help them?
I recently asked that an old childhood friend of mine and his gf. Obviously, they found it hard to answer and a 'weird question'. But what they eventually settled upon as answer was "everything, but mainly other people, the current situation of these people, or their own current situation"
Probably a new set of masts & sails for their boat.
Or a new oil pumping station.
Or maybe a new truck.
Most policing of other people's behavior is for your own personal benefit, so whatever makes it most likely for the autistic person to behave in the desired way is the "right way" to call it.
Shame and being ostracized are just ways to make sure no one else falls out of line.
It'll continue until it stops working. We need to be individually brave and support each other against stuff like this, and I think all will turn out fine :)
Stop having a goal with women specifically. You talking about experience and success with women is literally the total opposite of what makes sense.
Just have fun with a person. You have had fun interacting with people before, right? Just do that. The literal only difference is that you can sprinkle in some sexual innuendos or some shit, if you think of it. If not, also fine. Then go home and resume what you always do. Repeat.
If while doing this you ever notice some sexual tension, just do something sexual. Touch them. Or tell them you find them attractive. Or ask to kiss them. Whatever, it literally doesn't matter. If they don't like it, you'll likely notice because they tell you and then you can do something different. If they like it, you'll also likely notice, and continue escalating from there. Touching platonic -> kissing -> making out hair/neck/back-> touching sexually titties/butt -> touching pussy. Natural progression.
If you notice something afterwards, while thinking about it (like someone giving you obvious signals that you completely missed), if you can, just respond to the signal as soon as you notice, don't think "now it's too late". In fact, it's never to late until you tried it and it didn't work.
But yeah, I can't stress this enough. The most important thing is to not expect anything. In fact, maybe you'll never have sexual contact again. It's best if you're content with nothing but masturbating for the rest of your life.
No, only those who imprison people for peaceful protest.
There's a difference between "wouldn't work" and "wouldn't work as nicely". That's what this post is about :D Most websites would still work in the same basic way without js.