Q anon would be nothing compared to the unhinged conspiracy theories that would spawn out of that
Azarova
Carrying capacity refers to an enivornment's ability to sustain the life of X amount of Y species. If the species exceeded this capacity, there wouldn't be enough resources for them all and the population would collapse. In the context of climate change, people will sometimes claim that humanity is reaching/is already at/has exceeded the carrying capacity of Earth. Instead of questioning if we should change the way we use resources just a little bit, reactionaries will instead make the jump to not only concluding that this analysis is correct, but also that it justifies ecofascist policies towards the climate crisis which, regardless of their form, ultimately amount to genocide as a means to "depopulate" Earth as a """solution""" to the crisis.
It would honestly not surprise me to find out like 25-40% of US GDP is just scams from healthcare and the military buying packs of pens for like $400
Doesn't seem to be the exact source the_kid is quoting, but a source for the quotes: https://tass.com/world/1696203
I've been so tempted to do this for years, but I'd be so afraid they'd notice the missing income and figure something was up.
Is 'fungi' pronounced 'fun-guy' or 'fun-jai'?
This kinda stuff is making me consider making an inventory of all the food and ingredients I have so I stop doing this ;_;
Looks sorta like a T-34 turret on a Maus chassis, I hate it.
Is this a tagline yet? Because it needs to be.
I am willing to get dunked on for this, but I honestly believe that if nature worshipping religious traditions had remained dominant we would not be nearly as worse off as we are today.