I'm not the person you replied to, but pretty sure the question was whether the neighbor in your story replaced their hedge with a vinyl fence specifically.
Banning something does not always fix the problem of its use. Per the article, there's a sizable sporting contingent with competitions being common. If there's money and fun in it, it doesn't go away just because the government says you can't do it anymore.
The article also mentions lots of local bans, and that the practice remains popular regardless. Motorcyclists still get cut by the lines, sometimes fatally, but there isn't any formal data collection to categorize the lines as a cause of death.
That's a nice disclaimer. They should clarify that in their privacy policy directly instead of just saying "oh that's not what we meant guys, pinky promise 😉"
It's the same "I'll respect you if you respect me" dynamic in an imbalanced-power system.
I'm screwing you over if I personally feel bad for what I'm doing to you (never happens, therefore I'm always fair). You're screwing me over if you inconvenience me.
Considering there are like 340 million people living in the US, it's quite unlikely for another to emerge at those odds, especially since the insurance Execs went on higher alert after the first incident
It's just premusk twitter at this point.
I mean, given that Jack Dorsey founded it as basically the "not Twitter Twitter" after musk bought the main one, I don't think it's surprising to see it face basically the same moderation issues in the name of being "even-handed"
I mostly agree, but I'd set the cutoff date sometime around 2023, maybe up until 2024 for someone completely checked out of the Internet and/or Elon's bullshit. It's part of why the CT is targeted so much in this way, but not the model 3 or S. There are a lot of people who just wanted an electric vehicle when Tesla looked like one of the more compelling options (mostly due to marketing than actual features/reliability but what can you do about that in hindsight).
People only notice the generated works that they notice, they don't notice the generated elements that they don't notice.
Basically the Toupee fallacy
Probably some sort of software patent licensing issue, if I had to guess
Consideration of this incident as terrorism is a great indicator of the position of private businesses within US policy. Corporations are, for all intents and purposes, a core contingent of the US government and its policy, hence why the corporate media+capital class+politicians are treating it as such.
I've heard Department of Government Elimination but that works too
The point of the article seems to be for raising awareness I guess? I dunno I'm not from Brazil but I found it to be an interesting article.
imo it's perfectly fine to push for local action if federal-level bans have not been as effective as they need to be. While just writing the same piece of paper saying "you can't do this" by the city won't do anything, one can draw attention to the issue within the context of resource and enforcement allocation. I won't speak to the bigger picture as I have no idea what that looks like for Brazilian locales.
Edit: though I guess you're right that the article doesn't really address these facets of the issue. I think it doesn't properly go into ways the problem can be further addressed, including more proactive ones vs just ramping up enforcement.