Armand1

joined 2 years ago
[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

Is that you, Orel?

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 165 points 2 days ago (39 children)

The company should be sued into the ground. This is horrendous

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

You know what they say about leopards and faces...

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Signed up and donated. Related interview:

https://youtu.be/VDC8lNkFfTQ

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I thought that OEM unlocking was removed years ago? That's why I've not bought Samsung phones since the mid-2010s.

They had a thing that would blow a fuse if you unlocked your phone. Did they get rid of that for a while?

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Not if they end up banning VPNs, which is already something being discussed. If that happens, I might genuinely leave the country.

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (12 children)

I wrote my CV site in React and Next.js configured for SSG (Static Site Generation) which means that the whole site loads perfectly without JavaScript, but if you do have JS enabled you'll get a theme switching and print button.

That said, requiring JS makes sense on some sites, namely those that act more like web apps that let you do stuff (like WhatsApp or Photopea). Not for articles, blogs etc. though.

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 39 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

We lost one 😭

RIP bozo

255
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 

Spotted in London. There were some for gay, lesbian and straight. 🏳️‍🌈

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Reminds me of this history fact about the movie Metropolis (1927):

Much to Fritz Lang's dismay, Adolf Hitler and Joseph Goebbels were big fans of the film. Goebbels met with Lang and told him that he could be made an honorary Aryan despite his Jewish background. Goebbels told him "Mr. Lang, we decide who is Jewish and who is not." Lang left for Paris that very night.

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0017136/trivia/?item=tr1856898

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

This ain't their first rodeo

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

No idea why they were collecting identification then.

Even worse, since the hackers got a bunch of the data at once, the company must have held onto those pictures long after they registered people to their service, which they likely didn't need to do.

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The drivers license thing is likely due to a law passed by the UK a few days ago requires all mature content to be behind an age check. And not a "Are you 18: Yes / No", more like "we will check using ID and photos of you".

It's the most hated piece of legislation in a while, with already 100 000 petition votes in 3 days to repeal it.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/32225244

The UK's EHRC recently opened a public review period for their new Code of Practice for following the Equality Act of 2010.

Despite previous claims that this judgement does not reduce trans rights, its new Code of Practice tells a different story.

I spent 8 hours reading through the entire Code of Practice, analysing it and writing up my feedback. Like all the trans people who organized a Mass Lobby over this, I also concluded that this new guidance was horrific. See Trans Solidarity Alliance's guidance on this situation.

Amongst many other dangerous and belittling statements about "biological sex" and how trans people should use services that align with their sex at birth stated throughout the entire thing, it clearly states in Section 13.3.19 that single sex services cannot lawfully include trans people of a matching gender. Asserting that this would amount to discrimination against cis people of the opposite sex.

Picture this: You're a trans person that has suffered domestic abuse. You seek a support group to help you. You find a women's support group friendly to trans women. A gender critical finds out about this, and asks a cis male friend to threaten to sue the support group for discrimination. The support group is forced to make a difficult decision: become trans-exclusionary, leaving you with no support or go to court on the matter.

This EHRC views the complaint by the cis man, here as completely lawful and in following with the Equality Act, an act meant to protect minorities, and urges organizations to not include trans people because of it.

It bases its entire guidance on the idea that trans people are not their acquired gender, and it's ok to pry into and treat them as their birth sex.

116
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 

I got the inspiration for this when I was going through all my old images when migrating to Immich.

Left-to-right: A coffee container, A Coke bottle with the label taken off, A pasta sauce jar, a coke can with the top removed with a can opener.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/30910548

The UK's Equality and Human Rights Commission, famous for recently trampling on human rights by arresting peaceful protesters, has decided that trans people need to stop complaining about people taking away their rights.

 

The UK's Equality and Human Rights Commission, famous for recently trampling on human rights by arresting peaceful protesters, has decided that trans people need to stop complaining about people taking away their rights.

 

This post reads as 'You have been deemed guilty of aiding the undesirables. You will be punished."

210
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/cat@lemmy.world
 

“Anonymous has decided to enforce the Judge's order since you and your sycophant staff ignore lawful orders that go against your fascist plans,” a defacement message posted to GlobalX’s website reads.

 

Link to a Reddit post by an activist I know.

But to summarise, Amendment NC21 to the Data Use and Access Bill would require sex to be defined as "sex at birth" for all identity verification requests.

This includes people who have changed their sex legally, which will now be separately catalogued.

This means that all kinds of people, including (potential) employers, landlords, government staff etc. will be able to look up these details about you.

This amendment will be voted on on the 7th of May, so if you're in the UK please badger your MP to vote against it (template email in the Reddit post)

655
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 

I got tired of Google shoving AI down my throat in yet another place in my phone.

I'm surprised it even gave me the choice to "report and block".

 

... in the context of the 2010 Equalities Act.

Personal note:

This is a dangerous precedent that is already being used to justify banning trans women from women's bathrooms, and will likely allow male police / security to manhandle women to ascertain their gender. It will also put trans women at a further disadvantage for getting jobs, as if there wasn't enough stigma as is.

Get ready for the genital inspectors, more transpotting (like with that non-trans lady in the Olympics) and an increased amount of abuse of trans people.

 

Disclaimer: Not sure if there are other smaller ones in other parts of Gaza.

view more: next ›