Arcka

joined 2 years ago
[–] Arcka@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago

Gladly go back to every site having an animated 'under construction' gif.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If there are other people, you likely mean a campground which is not retreating to nature. Campgrounds are very unnatural manipulated outdoor spaces.

Hopefully you have real wilderness near you where camping is allowed in places you could likely not encounter other humans. Highly recommend the experience if so. It makes campgrounds feel like trailer parks in comparison.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

^ Obviously uneducated about the topic.

At least read up on JStark and the FGC-9.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

Lucky the tests worked for you as they are notoriously inaccurate!

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 37 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Apple absolutely does collect personal data from its users and uses that data to target advertising. They openly disclose this in their policy statements.

Stating that

They do not profit off your data

is unjustifiable when Apple makes BILLIONS from advertising.

They also have been fined by European regulators when their practices ran afoul of privacy law.

Just because they're not as bad as Google (quite a low bar) it doesn't mean they're as good as they try to sell you on.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Enabling the ability for purchasers to specify an arbitrary server to connect to would require a design change compared to how most games are recently. That feature used to be standard in the early years of online gaming.

We had online-only multiplayer games in the early 2000s with self-hosted servers supporting over 60 players per map. It's absolutely possible to do better with today's tech.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

At least he seems to have plenty of offers to help him with his other foot. Not everyone is so lucky.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

Agreed, and it's not like clean energy generation and good wastewater treatment are impossible - just more expensive. Perhaps 10x the normal cost per bag would pay for the difference?

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 8 points 1 month ago

Thank you for the difficult public service you do.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If this is the ruling which causes you to lose trust that any legal system (not just the US') aligns with morality, then I have to question where you've been all this time.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 7 points 1 month ago

So which cameras can be used to overcome normal face coverings? https://piped.video/watch?v=yRFeS72IM6M

 

A unanimous Supreme Court dismissed Mexico's claim that U.S. gun manufacturers aided and abetted the pipeline of weapons from the U.S. to Mexican drug cartels.

"Mexico's complaint does not plausibly allege that the defendant gun manufacturers aided and abetted gun dealers' unlawful sales of firearms to Mexican traffickers," Justice Elena Kagan, one of the court's three liberals, wrote for the court.

At issue was Mexico's claim that Smith & Wesson and other gunmakers were turning a blind eye to hundreds of thousands of high-powered weapons made in the U.S that are illegally trafficked into in the hands of Mexican cartels.

Mexico argued that it is a country where guns are supposed to be difficult to get. There is just one store in the whole country where guns can be bought legally, yet the nation is awash in illegal guns sold most often to the cartels. Mexico maintains that gushing pipeline of what it calls "crime guns" comes from the United States where manufacturers know which dealers are the bad actors.

"You can't hide behind the middleman and pretend like you don't know what's happening," Jonathan Lowy, co-counsel for Mexico and president of Global Action on Gun Violence, told NPR earlier this year.

But the gun industry found that argument flawed.

Lawrence Keane, counsel for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the trade association for the firearms industry, told NPR earlier this year that every sale to a consumer by a licensed retailer is approved by the federal government, and every transaction requires a federally mandated background check.

Mexico is arguing that a "lawful distribution system that's approved under federal law … is aiding and abetting cartels," Keane said. "If that was all that was required, Budweiser would be responsible for drunk driving accidents all across the United States, and apparently including Mexico."

Ultimately, a unanimous Supreme Court agreed.

view more: next ›