Architeuthis

joined 2 years ago
[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Somehow I doubt sneerclub turning out to be gigachad central is going to do wonders for curing their persecution complex, but I'm here for it, I even have a couple of (really local) combat sports tournament medals to show for from back in the day.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Self-hating nerd may sound like a quip, but he is pretty specifically painting us as tribe traitors.

Remember, for them, the male nerd is a vulnerable minority, and that they haven't been granted protected status yet is possibly the greatest injustice of our time.

We're basically supposed to be fucking up their chances for finally instituting a society-wide word-count based sex redistribution scheme by cozying up to ~~the Man~~ normies who think cults are bad and don't appreciate race science.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 8 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

CEO of onlyfans competitor manyvids possibly lost to AI psychosis

It's a gizmodo summary of a 404 article but the latter is login-walled so

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago

woo takes about quantum mechanics and the power of self-affirmation

In retrospect it's pretty obvious this was central to his character: he couldn't accept he got hella lucky with dilbert happening to hit pop culture square in the zeitgeist, so he had to adjust his worldview into him being a master wizard that can bend reality to his will, and also everyone else is really stupid for not doing so too, except, it turned out, Trump.

From what I gather there's also a lot of the rationalist high intelligence is being able to manipulate others bordering on mind control ethos in his fiction writing,

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There’s no good reason for male circumcision

Supposedly it reduces std transmissions and thus HPV caused cancers, which of course is neither here nor there with respect to doing it to people who can't meaningfully consent, and also there are non surgical alternatives like condoms and hpv vaccines.

Female circumcision is usually butchery and completely indefensible.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago

https://archive.is/20260109131721/https://www.theverge.com/news/859309/grok-undressing-limit-access-gaslighting

Turns out even the paywalling is fake since you can still do the edits by accessing grok from other parts of the interface like context menus, you just can't outright ask it in a tweet.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

heads up I heavily edited the post while you were responding though I don't think the essence changed. I added their reasoning for only allowing image generation for paying subs and expanded the table a bit.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

https://archive.is/20260109080655/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/09/grok-image-generator-outcry-sexualised-ai-imagery

In response to the outcry image generation is now turned off for non-paying users. Ostensibly it's so people who are not using Grok as god intended can be identified via their subscription information, but I can't help but think it's just Elon explicitly monetizing grok's CSAM capabilities.

Grok subscription tier Free Premium
CSAM Generation - ✔️
Revenge porn generation - ✔️
Create images of women shot and killed - ✔️
[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's not just the anglo governments dropping the ball, there's also the various app stores who simply won't enforce their own explicit rules and ban the Grok app, I guess because the notion of accountability for the effects of AI slop must remain unthinkable for as long as possible.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 11 points 1 month ago

If the great AI swindle has taught us anything, is that what's good for normal people isn't really important when all the macro-economic incentives point the other way and towards the pockets of the ultra rich.

As of April 2025, only 17% of Americans thought AI would have a positive effect on the US over the next 20 years. Only 23% thought AI would be positive for how people do their jobs.

robert anton wilson intensifies

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (13 children)

Still, it merits pointing out that this explicitly isn't happening because the private sector is clamoring to get some of that EY expertise on nothing the moment he's available, but because MIRI is for all intents and purposes a gravy train for a small set of mutual acquaintances who occasionally have a board meeting to decide how much they'll get paid that year.

transcription

The way it actually works is that I'm on the critical path for our organizational mission, and paying me less would require me to do things that take up time and energy in order to get by with a smaller income. Then, assuming all goes well, future intergalactic civilizations would look back and think this was incredibly stupid; in much the same way that letting billions of person-containing brains rot in graves, and humanity allocating less than a million dollars per year to the Singularity Institute, would predictably look pretty stupid in retrospect. At Singularity Institute board meetings we at least try not to do things which will predictably make future intergalactic civilizations think we were being willfully stupid. That's all there is to it, and no more.

This is from back when MIRI, then Singularity Institute, was paying him like $120K/y -- https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/qqhdj3W3vSfB5E9ss/siai-an-examination?commentId=4wo4bD9kkA22K5exH#4wo4bD9kkA22K5exH

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 5 points 2 months ago

OpenAi yearly payroll runs in the billions, so they probably aren't hurting.

That Almsost AGI is short for Actually Bob and Vicky seems like quite the embarrassment, however.

view more: ‹ prev next ›