ApathyTree

joined 2 years ago
[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah I just want to get an idea of what the process might look like for an external person, I have a place in mind to try reaching out to to start, so I’ll contact those orgs and see what I can do, thanks :)

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

That sounds like a good place to start, thanks! I’ll get in touch with them and see what happens. I know a place indirectly through a friend who just moved on (who thus knows a lot of people still there) which is ripe for unionizing, due to disrespect of the existing workforce. So I have a start point in mind.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Fun thing about that video: laughter is a social signal.

Most people when they watch or read funny things alone will not laugh nearly as much (if at all) as when they see the same thing in a social setting, even if they are just as amused by it.

Because laughter is a signal that we get the joke (In a social setting where the laughter reaction is appropriate).

That’s why there are more nuanced labels, like “this caused a sharp exhalation through my nose” or “I chuckled in public and people are looking at me”. And we mostly all recognize the significance of that, because it’s rare we bust a gut solo in inappropriate settings, too.

But you can’t say “that’s really amusing” or similar, even when it is, because that’s hurtful to people as it’s phrasing often used derisively. So we pretend to have extreme reactions for hyperbolic reasons, I guess, and this is what happens.

Humans are really fascinating context dependent entities.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That can’t be good for bullet movement tho, right? Like that just seems really inefficient..?

I don’t know much about guns but I’m fairly certain they need to build up pressure behind the projectile, and this design seems inherently flawed there… but it also needs a straight trajectory out or it’ll go all wonky in flight and be super inaccurate.. would this not drastically impact that?

Or is this a nonfunctional thing?

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

Do borg have flowing blood?

I don’t think I’ve ever seen one bleed (exception; 7 of 9. Barely counts as she’s been readjusted to human functions).

(Serious question here)

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Moth spaghetti deer innards was not on my list of things to see today, but kinda glad it happened anyway.. I think..?

Jk, very well done and interesting :)

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Stable diffusion online version, several weeks ago. Might not be the same situation anymore, idk how often that stuff gets updated, and I’m not able to test it at the moment.

It’s also possible that some sort of “sticky idea” got into its head and made it start generating it that way after it did one like that. I’ve heard that sort of thing isn’t uncommon.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Significant racist bias is an understatement.

I asked a generator to make me a “queen monkey in a purple gown sitting on a throne” and I got maybe two pictures of actual monkeys. I even tried rewording it several times to be a real monkey, described the hair and everything.

The rest were all women of color.

Very disturbing. Pretty ladies, but very racist.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

There is an argument to be made that there’s a public security interest to encrypt some traffic, like when they call in someone’s information to run a check on them. And I think that’s a legit concern.

There are some fully encrypted systems (which cops want), and there are some hybrid systems, which are more expensive but would keep transparency in place for the population. Those systems work a variety of ways, such as putting the live comms on a 30-minute delay when there’s a big incident, and fully blocking personal information from citizens.

I think the latter is what they should be using, with very very very specific and clear rules on when they can and cannot encrypt, with regular external audits of the encrypted portion to verify no misuse. But if they won’t go hybrid and submit to inspection, leave it wide open. It’s more important that we have transparency (at this moment in time, due to police behavior), which is a thing I really really hate to say but it’s true..

view more: ‹ prev next ›