Just like how if people want to be billionaires enough, they find ways to change themselves or their circumstances to make it happen. People only have partial control over who they are and the circumstances they're in, and the changes they're able to make don't always make a difference here.
AnyOldName3
If you've got a magnifying glass, your phone will be able to autofocus much closer if you put the magnifying glass between the camera and the object.
Most software is like this, but you also don't get to look at the source code either.
It looks like the change happened nearly a year ago, and no one's kicked up a fuss, so either it was done properly (i.e. past contributors were contacted and consented to the licence change, and any that didn't had their contributions replaced), or there's a big problem once a past contributor notices.
It doesn't make it any more legal to fork the project without going back to the last GPL3 commit, though, as any contributions after the license change have to be assumed to be covered by the new licence, so the combined work would be under an invalid licence (as the old and new licences aren't compatible) rather than being still covered by the old licence.
Normally, I'd completely dismiss the possibility that a licence change like this could have been done properly, but Stenzek is associated with Dolphin Emulator, which did manage to pull off a switch from GPL2 to GPL3+ by emailing lots of people and replacing a lot of code.
The licence doesn't permit derivative works, so no forks and no downstream packages.
Sometimes the ones that are a fifth the price on AliExpress are the ones that failed QA testing for the whitelabeller, or they're the same board with lower-rated components attached, so they're not necessarily identical.
A trick is to weigh the filament before you start drying it and then weigh it again every few hours to see if it's stopped getting lighter. If it's been hours since it lost a single gram, then it's probably close enough to as dry as it's going to get, and if it still doesn't behave, then there must be a second problem.
Someone doesn't understand the Windows design language. Anxiety would be a yellow warning triangle. That's a red error circle, so something really has gone wrong and you're right to be panicking about it, and better remember what it is before the consequences become too dire.
The pun doesn't even make sense unless the term was already in common use when Hopper wrote it. If you don't already know what a computer bug is, the note sounds deranged.
This is untrue. I can't do this because I can't convince the verification tool that my phone really has a camera, so I can't show it Norman Reedus.
At the moment, they're already at risk of being removed by the government, who can make them illegal, and simultaneously at risk of being removed by payment processors, who can prevent the stores from operating. It makes no difference to the government whether they're also the payment processor. They could remove them anyway. Having two entities with unilateral power to remove something can't be worse than just having one of them.
You're already doing better than a whole lot of people if you're getting invited to parties. Of the people I was at school, university, or work with, I'm the only one who bothers hosting parties, and that won't broaden my social circle as I already know everyone. Most people don't have enough living space to have more than a few people over and can't afford to cater for a bunch of extra people. Even for attending parties someone else hosts, travel and accommodation can be a pain. If you're not within taxi range and there isn't abundant late night public transport, you'll either need to not drink and then drive home, find a hotel, or hope the party is small enough that there'll be space to crash.