Anonbal185

joined 2 years ago
[–] Anonbal185@aussie.zone 10 points 2 years ago

I mean Joe Lycett was briefly known as Hugo Boss, name didn't stick after he changed it back.

[–] Anonbal185@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago

There's actually a famous instance of it happening. K-19. They had to go into the reactor room to fix up the cooling because of botched manufacturing process.

What happened to them after can only be described as gruesome. I'd rather a bullet to the brain after.

[–] Anonbal185@aussie.zone -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If China wanted peaceful unification they can have it tomorrow.

Cede all power to Taiwan and they can be one country. They definitely won't be bullied by Taiwan and unlike China Taiwan would accept differing opinions. It's been done successfully before to a large extent. East and West Germany joined together as one country without the need for border fences or two systems in one country. Just imagine what a basket case of a country if it happened the other way around. 2 systems, border fences different currencies, declining standings on corruption, political freedom etc.

But of course they'll never do that. Because deep down it's not the country they care about. They only care about the CCP itself.

Edit: looks like the wumaos are in force, not surprising as a large number of them are otherwise unemployed now 😂

[–] Anonbal185@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago

It's not even internal strife. It all comes down to it's now or never. If they let this opportunity slip by they will never get Taiwan.

Their population is declining and there's nothing that can be done about it in any meaningful way. Nothing has worked to get people to have more children. As they get older people of military age will decline.

Right now this generation the males outnumber the females. Which means expendable soldiers. These people will never marry and benefit the state in anyway.

The leverage China has is it's consumers it's one of the largest markets. But the Chinese buying things to support international companies is quite minuscule as a percentage of the population and will decline as time goes on, they get all the media attention that's all . They've been struggling to boost internal consumption for years.

And it isn't that surprising. Chinese people are one of the most tightarse people ever. They haggle everything and that's even if they get to the point of actually going to buy it. Spending money to make money usually doesn't factor in.

[–] Anonbal185@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago

Dictators seem to outlive most people it seems. Mugabe made it to 90s. Obiang is 81. Everyone is waiting for Putin. Xi could also join this club, if he starts hitting the gym.

[–] Anonbal185@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago

I like NSW governments policy. Highrise depends on infrastructure and not how far it is from the CBD. But it is still not good enough.

We have 220m+ in Parramatta which is 20km from CBD and from what I understand the application for it to be higher was denied because it was too close to the airport.

Macquarie Park, Rhodes are new suburbs with 150m+ (definition for a skyscraper). Many others are getting 100m+, Olympic Park, Liverpool etc.

So it is quite spread out already. Even places very far away from Sydney like Penrith, Rouse Hill, Edmondson Park and Leppington will be zoned for high rise.

But we need to overhaul the zoning laws for the missing middle. In Sydney Bankstown to Marrickville and Revesby to Turella should all be up for 100m towers or maximum allowed due to proximity to airport.

[–] Anonbal185@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Three times the minimum salary doesn't seem too enticing to go into a warzone. Money is useless if you're dead and won't cover for your disabilities if you get injured. But hey that's just me, each to their own I guess.

[–] Anonbal185@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't get what's so special about Grindr. I only knew about it because it was on the news one time and was known as the gay tinder ripoff. Even down to the name.

If the app was known by something else that doesn't sound like a Tinder ripoff most people wouldn't even hear about it.

Not my type of app so I've never used it but I can't think of anything that tinder couldn't do. All tinder has to do is to have a new column in the database

All the other apps need to do is to check if the person's gender== their preferred gender then that person is gay. If gay show people of same gender otherwise show opposite gender. Any app can do this.

I hope they lose alot of revenue for forcing people back into the office.

[–] Anonbal185@aussie.zone 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

It's nowhere near a good salary to be potentially shot at blown up and killed. You can get way more than that sitting at an office (most likely at home now due to WFH).

I wouldn't go at all but if I were to go I would probably want 5x+ that amount minimum due to the inheritent danger.

Edit: since you're at war you're effectively working 24/7, I fail to see how anything less than minimum 15-20x the amount is a good salary all things considered.

[–] Anonbal185@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago

I wonder how this affects countries like China and Russia. I would think this would be a good plan maybe a decade ago when whilst still a dictatorship it was governed by more than one person.

Now with those countries it's basically governed by one person who obviously has many internal enemies. If they change course then Xi is a dead man, same as Putin and Fatman Kim.

In China's instance Xi has ruined many of his fellow citizens lives (by clamping down on a few industries causing significant job losses because they were a threat to his power). Basically as time goes on their policy would be influenced by the survival of one man.

[–] Anonbal185@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago

China is a closed society dictatorship. They're not attractive to higher educated talented people who have a choice where to immigrate to. It would be good for society as a whole for China to get smaller because of they get too big they will try to conquer a few other countries.

Japan is different and has changed over the last half century. They don't arbitrary detain you or try to be repressive. Society will not lose out if there are more Japanese in the world.

In fact Japan does well with soft power, all my friends love holidaying there and some would even immigrate if the rules were relaxed. Whereas none would go live permanently in china even if they gave out PR on arrival.

Apples and oranges.

[–] Anonbal185@aussie.zone 38 points 2 years ago (9 children)

It's France they're very xenophobic. Just look at how they treat the Corsicans, Brentons, Basques and Catalans.

Night and day to even a few hundred metres across the road in Spain or Andorra.

view more: ‹ prev next ›