AndyLikesCandy

joined 2 years ago
[–] AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago

I don't think they need to be pushy, just the quality of product decisions has been going down as time goes on. Monopoly a bigger issue for sure, If not for the massive decline in value to both users and advertisers, we wouldn't mind the monopoly so much.

[–] AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Google must be scraping the bottom of the barrel of crazy that's also stupid enough to pay for ads, I think it's common knowledge now that Google games analytics to artificially inflate the appearance of ad impact.

[–] AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago

This is the way forward

[–] AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com 0 points 2 years ago

Ah yes that's where their development resources for all the last 5 years went: fucking up the paid experience with minor tweaks and fucking up the free experience with major tweaks.

I pay for this shit for my whole family and don't know a service with anywhere near the same library, I'd jump ship in a heartbeat to a service with both a complete music library and a first-class podcast listening experience for web/PC users.

[–] AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago

Don't worry, an MS13 member and a school shooter once walked across that border together so it's okay because it's definitely for everyone's safety.

[–] AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago

I'm not an Aussie and I'm not following this in particular, but from what I've seen that's how bad ideas work: you don't want to start a dialogue where the noes point out all the flaws in your ideas. In the US the extreme of this is legislation passed in a specially coordinated session at midnight with an absolute minimum of debate.

With that said, why the hell does a budgeted program belong in a constitution and not in a regular legislated budget? And why the hell does one specific group need specific recognition defined at the level of a constitution, as opposed to broad rules changed in such a way that their specific exclusion is forbidden with a catch all that also benefits other minorities?

[–] AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah shielding. Totally passive.

mobsters did that in their houses, people who buy them often only learn about the previous owner after realizing that one or two rooms are faraday cages - zero wifi or cellular.

[–] AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com 16 points 2 years ago

Thank heavens, children could have been hurt!

view more: ‹ prev next ›