Oh well, I knew it would end there.
I am not, and it's not meant to be a lesson or exercise.
I'm saying this kind of violation, however it may be a manifestation of experience and lived emotions, may end up exacerbating the problem. Also, the lived experiences of harassment, abuse and manipulations are by no means exclusive to women, as many men will subscribe to. Still, generalizing it to women or men being bad would be a terrible and unproductive idea.
It can lead followers astray and set others against them, leading to useless kind of radicalization that leaves one side angry and with a lost sight of the issue, and the other repulsed and not set to participate and help build something better.
This is what happened to radicals of both sides. No one on the other side listens to them anymore. Radical feminist became a slur, despite the reasonable origins, and masculism's image has shifted from a movement for equality focused on men's part to mostly manosphere shitheads going for patriarchy that hurts everybody. Everyone's yelling, nothing productive gets done.
With all that said, I am genuinely sorry for what you experience, I have no intent to belittle it, and I do not allow men around me to behave the way you describe. This must be eliminated, and this is a big issue and danger still persisting in modern society.
Feminism and general antisexism
Uh, then they'll come to their civilian wives and make children who hold no relation to their atrocities.
Not too badass, just dumb. Now, some sort of vaginal blades wouldn't hurt...
Just...do both, and keep some parts of your life separate. Have a public face, talk to regular folks etc, and then have your hidden community of privacy enthusiasts that you manage accordingly.
I wouldn't read it that way.
Being instrumental doesn't mean being the only important factor, and Truthout clearly mentions this is the third most popular reason, not the first.
What I said is not in support of that, and I have to make it clear.
What you describe is criminal activity, and it should be so.
Hey, I am genuinely sympathetic to your concerns, and there's no need to make it an attack. Moreover, I'm not supportive of people saying anything without regards of how it affects others - I genuinely despise people doing what you describe.
I'm only calling for basic ethics while you're at it - it's never a good idea to go after a certain extremely wide and diverse group of people (white men, in this case, but can be any other) and then restrict them from setting the record straight. Everyone has the right to stand up for themselves.
Without it, we get violent echo chambers that get more and more detached from reality, and also anger those that are targeted to no benefit, which is antithetical to a productive change.
Think of the manosphere bullshit that goes extremely violent, has absolutely nothing of valid substance and drowns any female voices. This is it. This is what you get over time if you ignore the other side.
And this is why male voices are going to spring up here - and women are gonna keep rightfully attacking the manosphere. No one needs the escalation of bullshit and angering that happens with it.
Some people ask me why I use Flatpak on Arch. This is one of the reasons.