AlexandairBabeuf

joined 4 years ago
[–] AlexandairBabeuf@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

should i have a beer?

[–] AlexandairBabeuf@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Anglos were/are extraordinarily freaked out about the terror

neither the French nor anyone else care about it quite so much

take from that what you will

[–] AlexandairBabeuf@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago

literally the CIA hating freedom and democracy

[–] AlexandairBabeuf@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago

solar panels or wind turbines aren't environmentally free either, those costs are just more readily externalised than spicy rocks

[–] AlexandairBabeuf@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago* (last edited 4 years ago)

the US has plenty of domestic mine waste dont you worry

[–] AlexandairBabeuf@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago (4 children)

here i thought we'd relentlessly bullied the skeptics off here but at least one survivor is hanging on

fucking conversations around nuclear waste are so asinine, it's a-ok to fucking bury everything else and forget about it, but the shit that literally has an expiration date on the danger is somehow a Grave Issue.

Yeah fucking talk to me about how much an issue a couple thousand tons of spicy dirt is while this country is burying hundreds of millions of tons of trash in the ground

[–] AlexandairBabeuf@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago

you dont need to! youre fully correct

[–] AlexandairBabeuf@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago

a naval blockade is attackin. the phoney war period is also when most of the german surface fleet got sunk.

also just before the Battle of France the French & British deployed in Norway, boots-on-the-ground fighting, thousands of allied casualties

[–] AlexandairBabeuf@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago (2 children)

Wally strategic planning presumed a semi-defensive war fought in Belgium or beyond, Belgium trying to do neutrality and re-enact WW1 fucked this up. the Saar offensive (and all other possible offensives on the french border) a) butted into the German defenses--hard fighting b) dislodged troops from a position of strength on the Maginot.

off of the franco-german border, the Wallys were perfectly prepared to engage the Axis, the naval war was hot, and a naval blockade was initiated. the blockade especially indicates Wally intentions, you'd hardly expect a germany cut off from the rest of the world to invade the USSR and win

[–] AlexandairBabeuf@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago (4 children)

Nazi interests were contrary to Wally interests. Imperialism is a zero-sum game and neither Britain nor France could allow Nazi supremacy on the continent. The 'optimism' that the Nazis could be thrown at the Soviets was essentially short-sighted and a gross miscalculation of Nazi ambition.

The whole Wallies being friendlier to Nazis than USSR is fodder for the pre-war appeasement conversation, and for blaming the Wallies for allowing the war to happen, not for claiming AFTER hostilities began that the Wallies were under any illusions of that happening.

[–] AlexandairBabeuf@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago

Killing Nazis fuck yeah!!!!!

The Wallies were committed to defeating the third reich, there was no conspiracy to let the soviets fall, and any post-war concerns were secondary to the very real utility of opening a second/third front

 

Curious where the majority of this site falls. No need to struggle or anything, I just wana see what y'all think.

[–] AlexandairBabeuf@hexbear.net 0 points 4 years ago (5 children)

since you seem to actually know things, is plastic carbon sequestration? this seems like a stupid question cuz obviously nobody is making plastic outta atmospheric carbon but like, is it "good" if petrol already extracted got plastic'd instead of fuel'd???

view more: next ›