Akisamb

Beh oui, arrêtons de construire des HLM puisque la population locale est contre. Arrêtons de construire des lignes de trains puisque la population locale est contre.

Qu'on le veuille ou non beaucoup de projets vont avoir des externalités négatives, il y aura toujours des populations prêtes à défendre leur intérêts au détriment de la collectivité.

La ZAD de Saclay est une très bonne illustration, on va s'opposer à la construction d'une ligne de métro car on est opposé à la densification du plateau de Saclay. Alors que la région parisienne est en manque cruel de logements, on va s'opposer à la création d'une ligne de transport en commun.

Cette écologie court termiste qui ne regarde que l'échelle locale est une menace pour l'environnement. C'est normal que l'état agisse. L'écologie se joue au niveau politique nationale et régionale, pas au niveau local.

WordPress wirh custom templates running on a LAMP stack.

Mais le ministère des Finances n’a pas ces pudeurs. Le projet de loi de Finances 2024 affiche les seuils d’emploi 2024 (EPT). 1331 postes sont supprimés dans l’enseignement du premier degré et 680 dans le second degré. Le privé voit partir 501 emplois. Au total ce sont 2512 postes qui sont supprimés. D’autres postes sont créés ailleurs : 24 000 pour la vie de l’élève (des postes d’AED et d’AESH) et 104 pour la Jeunesse pour accompagner le développement du SNU.

J'ai l'impression que c'est plutôt positif non ? Si les profs choppent un ou deux élèves de plus par classe a cause de la suppression de postes mais ont un soutien pour les élèves les plus difficiles ça peut passer.

Le budget est à la hausse après tout. Ceci j'aurais préféré des augmentations d'impôts et une éducation publique mieux financé mais force est de reconnaître que les français ne veulent pas de ça.

You can absolutely go to a corner store and buy alcohol. It's not a coincidence that it kills 3 million people per year worldwide.

Making drugs more accessible will increase consumption, that said it might reduce the negative effects for the consumers. If we allow the sell of drugs we should do everything we can to avoid the current situation with alcohol.

Make the packaging ugly, make people understand that they are consuming something that will at best reduce their life expectancy at worst kill them and generally reduce he quality of their lives.

Sure but look at alcohol, the consumer knows exactly what he's purchasing. Didn't stop a person I knew from dying from this shit.

Drugs should be difficult to get to reduce the chances of recreational use.

These models are Markov chains yes. But many things are Markov chains, I'm not sure that describing these as Markov chains helps gain understanding.

The way these models generate text is iterative. They do it word by word. Every time they need to generate a word they will randomly select one from their vocabulary. The trick to generating coherent text is that different words are more likely to happen depending on the previous words.

For example for the sentence "that is a huge grey" the word elephant is more likely than flamingo.

The temperature is the way you select your word. If it is low you will always select the most likely word. Increasing the temperature will make the random choice more random giving each word a more equal chance.

Seeing as these models function randomly there is nothing preventing them from producing unique text. After all, something like jsbHsbe d dhebsUd is unique but not very interesting.

This chatgpt cannot create a truly unique new sentence for example (A thing any of us here could easily do).

What ?

Of course it can, it's randomly generating sentences. It's probably better than humans at that. If you want more randomness at the cost of text coherence just increase the temperature.

Another aspect is that price negotiation for medecine is done done by the government. This is different from the USA where even Medicare doesn't have the right to negotiate it's price's.

Private insurers also get some of their insured redistributed between them by the government so that one insurer doesn't take all the expensive cases.

It's a brand, you can perfectly call your product Gruyère like in France and nobody will buy the product because they know it won't probably taste like the real stuff.

Don't know why people have such a hard time understanding why the original creators of a brand want to keep a monopoly on it.

Same principle why Google can index pretty much all books in existence. They were sued over this and won. Same thing will happen here.

As long as these models are not providing the copyrighted material to their users they should be safe.

Even if 99% of it would evaporate that would still be a ridiculous amount of power.

But Bill Gates proved that diversifying a stock of mainly one company while having that company keep all its value is possible. Elon Musk is horrifyingly rich like it or not. His power and the damage he can do is huge.