Akisamb

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Akisamb@programming.dev 12 points 2 years ago

Didier Raoult for a large part. He was the one who published the paper that really started this whole mess. His shoddy research practices and non-respect for patients did plenty of harm.

Good thing that they've forced his retirement.

[–] Akisamb@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hard to say from the article only, but if it is like the status quo in the EU and USA, then only the training data can be illegally obtained. If I have an AI that is able to say verbatim the script of the Bee movie, I will be sued.

Google books had a similar issue. They scanned pretty much all the books in existence and indexed them. Small issue they did not obtain the consent of the copyright holders before doing this. They were sued and won. You can use copyrighted data as long as you do not provide Access to it.

[–] Akisamb@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago

To avoid people being homeless ?

[–] Akisamb@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Les associations d'anti-corruption s'intéressent principalement au gouvernement, ce qui est bien normal. Je pense que le mieux est que tu juges leur travail toi-même :

(source pour leur habilitation il me semblait d'avoir lu le nom d'une troisième association, mais je me souviens peut-être mal)

D'ailleurs, transperency france est pour le renouvèlement de l'accord pour Anticor. Je n'ai pas trouvé la position de sherpa.

[–] Akisamb@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Il reste trois associations d'anticorruption qui ont cet agrément. Ce qui est reproché à anticor, c'est leur aspect politique, ils se doivent de poursuivre des gens de tous les partis, ils n'ont pas le droit de se rapprocher d'une organisation politique.

Ainsi, certains aspects de leur organisation sont un petit peu moyens, comme le don anonyme de 80000 euros.

Après de ce que j'ai vu, l'association semble avoir fait des efforts pour augmenter leur transparence. Visiblement le choix va être fait par un tribunal administratif, donc on va avoir le fin mot de l'histoire.

Face à ce refus du gouvernement, Anticor se tournera à son tour devant le juge administratif. « Nous sommes quelque part soulagés de pouvoir enfin démontrer que nous remplissons bien tous les critères pour pouvoir être agréés », assure la présidente.

[–] Akisamb@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Akisamb@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nous avons découvert (…) dans la presse un certain nombre de choses extrêmement troublantes, notamment qu’il aurait été promis, négocié en échange de votes de soutien à ce texte, des casernes de gendarmerie, des postes de police et que sais-je encore

Beurk, du clientélisme. A la fin c'est ceux qui ont les élus les plus relous et les moins coopératifs qui se retrouvent avec tout les services.

[–] Akisamb@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

I think it's healthy to have clear boundaries with coworkers, they are not the same things as friends.

That said I spend 41 hours a week working, no way I'm not going to socialise with my coworkers. If I don't make any friends after several years of working at a place I feel I have done something wrong.

[–] Akisamb@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oui, après pas sûr que la majorité accepte.

[–] Akisamb@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

As long as the demographic chart of Palestinians murdered by the IDF looks like the actual Palestinian population demographic (1/3 women, 1/3 kids) it's safe to assume that there is absolutely no real targeting taking place.

Yes, there is a bump if you look at the Hamas fighting population demographics but it is a minority. The large majority of people killed in this war are civilians there is no doubt about that. I was denying the 1:100 figure. For example Hamas has 1\3 of female victims, yet have a 1:4 casualty rate.

Netanyahu literally said publicly that he saw wants to kill all Palestinians including the women and children and his deeds match his words.

No he didn't and you know it. Why lie ?

Some senior Hamas executives have had such a discourse for Jews before being very softly reprimanded by Hamas but no executive from the Israeli government. There have been plenty of dog whistles, but they are not stupid enough to say it literally.

Edit : I didn't realize it but you were the person calling for the massacre of civilians in an earlier comment. Explains why you would lie, you need to dehumanise your enemy. I'm not spending more energy on this. You're too far gone.

[–] Akisamb@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Frankly both are awful and both should not be allowed to take control of Israel/Palestine. I have no idea what solution there is to this conflict honestly, I just want things to stay somewhat factual.

I agree that the 5000 figure seems highly improbable. Israel has been quite effective at killing high members of Hamas but I doubt they have killed 5000 out of the 30000 militants.

view more: ‹ prev next ›