At a certain point they're gonna overplay their hand and people (not libs obviously but people capable of complex thought) are going to completely write off anybody putting out endless articles that boil down to "don't support genocide? Here's why you're worse than people who do!"
Adkml
joined 2 years ago
That's kind of my gut feeling too but then the question is did he unintentionally make a movie about a film where the movie is almost a 1 to 1 stand in for the film?
Saying that communism is bad because the wealth isn't all concentrated in the topn10% and somehow that makes it more authoritarian is the kind of mental gymnastics that really makes you lose hope the people were trying to talk to even have the capacity to understand anything.
This furthers my idea the film was self satire but idk if it's what Tarantino was going for and even less so of its what he would want to go for.
In the movie the nazis make an ahistorical hyper violent movie glorifying an individual as the reason the war was being won and were supposed to be disgusted at the people in the movie theater cheering on the violence.
Which is exactly what the viewers are doing as they watch an ahistorical hyper violent film about how the war was won by a few plucky American GIs and a "great women".
really not sure if this was supposed to be some kind of commentary or if the point was to rub right up against that point and the moral of the story was "but theyre nazis so fuck em"
Have a hard time articulating without making it sound like he was trying to absolve the nazis and I really don't think Tarantino message was "the people who like my films are just like the nazis" and I also don't think he's trying to comment on how the erasure of soviet contributions to the war is similar to nazis twisting history so maybe I'm reading too much into it.
In honor of his memory a judge ruled that somehow actually no, he didn't.
Same way that isis has a coordinated effort of sitting back, relaxing, and letting us continue to beat ourselves.
It's probablly more like 60 to 70 percent that actually can't do it but if you take a 30 minute walk your easily the top 25% of Americans in terms of physical fitness.
The rest of the percentage comes from disqualifying anybody who needs psych prescriptions.
It's really funny that even the name of the website is an admission they just want something that will confirm to conclussions they already arrived at.
Because they clearly think its a big deal or else they wouldn't make it part of their identity.
For the same reason it's funny when you get to the point of incel logic where they say that having sex with women is super gay.
Because they've clearly built a complicated narrative for why they aren't the the thing they hate even though it was only their own narrative that made that a bad thing.
Because they're trying to bodybshame people with normal sized penis' as removed.
Because they earnestly said "penis size and virtue are inversely proportional"
This is really approaching intentional ignorance levels of creduialism.
Yea but everybody told them to shut up and fuck off when they tried that so they've invented a new different word that means the exact same thing.
What do you mean me copy and pasting something into an ai review app doesn't contribute to society.
Well according to libs not voting for Biden is a vote for Trump.
Which means not voting for Trump is also a vote for Biden.
Which means if you don't vote for either of them you actually voted twice.
Which means you're half as likely to support Trump as the liberals who just voted ONCE by simply voting for Biden.
I'm starting to think their logic may be flawed here.