Adkml

Capitalism is constantly telling everybody else on the planet they're acceptable collateral damage but it also doesn't improve life for anybody except about 500 people.

I would be totally fine with farage having acid thrown on him.

Aka we're approaching terminal velocity

I feel like you're kind of pigeon holing the argument by sayingg all money is by definition the result of exploitation.

Nobody is going to argue that ExxonMobil should be able to do that, I still don't see why that makes taxes going towards good things instead of bad a bad thing if those taxes weren't the result of exploitation.

Like if the argument is that it's impossible to make money without exploiting somebody were still missing a few steps in how we go from some of the clueless capitalism the world has ever seen to an egalitarian society with no intermediate step.

Proves aren't getting the means of production without taking them from the people whoncutrently have them and i think getting a government to enforce that redistribution is a lot more likely than them giving it up willingly or forming an insurgent labor army that doesn't immedoatly get lut down by those well funded police forces.

Everybody should have rights but unfortunately if somebody with more capital than you decides to violate those rights there isn't really anything anybody other than you is going to do to protect them.

If you didn't want to rely on extracting resources from the third world seems like using taxpayer money to fund Healthcare rather than using it to fund imperialism would be a positive.

Also, using the taxes for training programs and subsidies of renewables for re-industrialization seems like a better plan then taking a bunch of money from the working class and giving it to Haliburton.

I'm legitimately confused if it's bad to worry about how taxes are being spent is the goal to get rid of taxes and hope for a government that benefits people without any money or is it for a more egalitarian society to spring up from pure anarcho capitalism with no taxes and no safety net.

Were going to prove he's not serious about this by trying to outflank him from the right.

What about all the countries that developed past that point? I don't see them just ditching the system without an intermediary.

Seems like a pretty good goal for a starting vector unless somebody has an idea how we go from the latest stages of capitalism to a moneyless society without an intermediate phase.

And I'm not sure "disliking the fact 40% of your paycheck goes to your own oppression is bad" is a great starting point

Seriously this is about the most obvious cash grab out of all of them.

I don't know anybody who gets excited about cracker barrel this is literally just them going after an untapped market.

No minorities were pressuring cracker barrel to be more accepting and welcoming.

Also I barely rember the last time I ate at one, and it was in the south, but I'm pretty sure they had some straight up minstrel show level souvenirs in their "gift shop" pretty sure the bigots would still feel right at home

Also there's still swaths of the country you can't visit as a black person with anything approaching relative ease.

Not to be too much of an edgy reddit atheist but the sentiment is right because your rights don't actually exist.