Adderbox76

She's made very few appearances with him; largely following Melania's lead and staying out of everything as much as possible.

It wouldn't surprise me in the least if the moment they lose the election, she tells him to fuck off and divorces him. Privately she's likely disgusted to find out that her husband is a feckless sycophant who without hesitation would sell out his own family for an attempt at power.

I'm not entirely clear on what your angle is (or even what you're particularly asking about). But I'll try my best to offer something meaningful.

From what I can gather, you are making the rather common mistake of equating captialism with corporate capitalism/venture capitalism It may seem convenient (and depressing to think of the things as intertwined, but they're really not.

Capitalism is very simple. It's the exchange of goods and services for monetary reward. The harder you work (theoretically) the more you're rewarded. It's only when corporations, venture capitalists and stock prices become involved that that notion begins to become corrupted.

If I make a point to trying to do my grocery shopping at the local grocery store rather than the big chain, that's still capitalism. I'd argue it's more pure capitalism than corporate douchebaggery.

If I have a neighbour who likes to make wooden furniture in his garage and I procure a table and chairs from him instead of going to IKEA. That's still capitalism.

If (as I had all the time growing up) our neighbours kept cows while my family kept chickens, we would purchase beef from them and they would purchase eggs and poultry from us. THAT'S CAPITALISM.

Seeing the reward from your own sweat rather than a corporation seeing the reward from other people's sweat.

I guess in some sort of answer to your question, take back the notion of capitalism from the greedy corporations that have hijacked it. Support your local community. Go to your local farmer's markets. Buy from local artisans and farmers. THAT'S how we reconcile (and fix) capitalism.

She's seeing the potential writing on the wall and is attempting to come across as moderate all of a sudden so that when the Republican party purge of MAGA begins, she can hopefully be overlooked by it.

So they....entered the neutral zone?

Kirk vibe intensifies.

I low key want to know that racoon's skin care routine. Flawless.

When you're as big an asshole as Trump, it's not really motivating for anyone around you to do more than half-ass it.

Great. Then you shouldn't have any problem coming up with three examples for us all.

The Xenomorph has been the only constant in her life throughout the entire franchise. Everyone else is temporary. So basically...yes...in so much as a nemesis can be a situationship.

Cold War II: Lunar Nuclear Boogaloo

they should have given those characters better deaths

That I absolutely agree with. They did 'em dirty with how they took them out.

Hicks and Newt had to die in the beginning of Alien 3 in order for the film to thematically even be an Alien film.

At their heart, the films are about Ripley being alone, more in common with the titular alien than with her termporary allies. She's an outsider in her crew. She's a civilian among marines. She's a woman among convicts. She's lost her child, she's lost 57 years of her life. The Alien is her only real touchstone now, and in a way that is very expressly shown in the films, that becomes a kind of "relationship" in itself. She's closer to the alien than she is to the people who surround her.

If Hicks and Newt survived and were part of Alien 3, it takes that away and makes it an ensemble cast, which thematically doesn't fit, and (I think) it's one of the reasons that a lot of the new Alien films just don't feel like Alien films; they're missing that key thematic ingredient. Ripley is a tragic character, doomed to battle alone against the only thing she has left in her life.

The main problem is that some, sometimes most, of immigrants don’t want to assimilate. They are creating ghettos, don’t respect local laws.

Generalisations like this are the very reason it's a polarising issue. Opinions like yours generally derive from "observation" and "gut feeling". Which by definition is completely anecdotal and harmful when it begins to be applied to millions of people all at once.

Betsy from insert town here sees an immigrant couple down the street in her home-town keeping to themselves and not really wanting to take part in the community. She's talking on the phone to nosy-nessie the town busybody who says "oh...you know...my aunt said the same thing about her insert culture neighbours." And then all of a sudden, that's just "how those people are"...all of them...everywhere.

Maybe this couple is just a little embarrassed about their english skills and want to strengthen them more before going into public everywhere, which comes across as shy. Maybe they're just private...who knows. But suddenly...."it's just how (those people) are", becomes the anecdotal "truth".

It's wrong, it's dangerous, and the fact that you don't even grasp the irony of your own comment is telling in a lot of ways.