Rock me, sexy jesus.
I won't go as far as to say Alien 3 was good. But I will say this:
Alien 3 was exactly the movie that it had to be in order to end the original trilogy properly from a story/thematic perspective.
I'm not even going to call it a guilty pleasure, but Josie and the Pussycats was a movie that I genuinely adored long before people started to appreciate it for the satire that it is.
As a CIS male I got endlessly mocked, but I stuck to my guns.
You don’t need to kill sentient beings in order to do population control
Ummmm....yeah...you kind of do. What other option would you have in mind? Sterilization of x percent of every herd in Canada in order to keep birthrates down? Do you have any idea how cost ineffective that is and how much that would add to the tax payers burden?
Please do stay in your little bubble of non-reality.
I wouldn't necessarily call those two facts "incidental". I'd be pretty confident calling it "cause and effect".
Its - "ownership"
It's - "being" (ie. IT IS)
There are plenty of grammar rules that are annoying to figure out. This isn't one of them.
-
Him --> His (no apostrophe...drops the m)
-
Her --> Hers (no apostrophe)
-
It --> Its (no apostrophe)
-
He is --> He's
-
She is --> She's
-
It is --> It's
Hromek didn't say what's next for him but that he's hopeful party members can build a province that reflects their values and aspirations.
If the province reflected your values and aspirations, you wouldn't have lost. That's kind of the whole point of elections.
Actually it'll be like every other election. Even without the decay of media and foreign influence, we live in a country that elects one party. They stay in power long enough to get complacent and stupid, so we replace them with another and do it all over again.
Trudeau, 10 years. Harper, 10 years, Chretien, 10 years. (Okay...Paul Martin was only three years, but he was appointed first), Brian Mulroney, 9 years (We pretend Kim Campbell never happened)
Whether right of left, we give every party in power so much leeway that they stay in power forever before we finally can't ignore their bullshit...and then we over-correct in the other direction and do it to the other side of the aisle.
Literally since 1984 it's essentially been Left-Right alternative every decade or so.
The current conservative rise is neither surprising nor new if you've been awake for the last 40 years. It's as Canadian as Maple Syrup.
Because if the earth doesn't want it, it has ways of shutting down that kind of thing.
Or alternatively, Christianity only exists because in an attempt to prevent it, someone from the future snapped Jesus out of existence. But it turns out that Jesus was just some dude who liked to do nice things for people until one day he poofed out of existence in front of a crowd and everyone suddenly figured he must be a god.
No. Just...no.
It's not that I disagree with you per se. I personally would never use one and I personally feel that there needs to be strict registration requirements for owning one. But banning all guns is like using a sledge hammer on a thumb tack; it's a far more delicate issue than you want it to be.
For starters, who determines what constitutes a "remote area"? There are plenty of hunters who may not need to hunt to survive, still enjoy hunting and eating wild game when it's in season. Who gets to decide that they aren't allowed to?
Secondly, what do you then propose we do about wildlife overpopulation? Hunters play a critical role in keeping wildlife under control. Every year there are rules about how many of each sex and how many of each breed you are allowed to hunt because it:
-
Keeps the populations under control. And,
-
Functions as a health measure for those very animals, since overpopulation can lead to not only starvation as much of their land has already been taken over by us humans, but also a number of wildlife diseases that can run unchecked in an overcrowded population (some of which CAN and HAVE crossed over to humans...ie. Rabies, bird flu, ebola, and dozens more.)
So you say "people don't need guns"? Hunting and gun ownership make up one half of a very important system in rural areas. NOT just remote areas with no "access to alternative food sources".
You're entire premise reads like spoiled city folk who like to open their high-and-mighty mouths before knowing a damn thing about what they want to say.
I didn't know what to do with my hours at work. I was almost at the point of actually...working...gross.