Adderbox76

I feel like this was the ultimate sin of Andromeda (a game that sadly had far too many sins)

It had some great combat mechanics (that I hope get ported over to the new one). But the characters are just ultimately so damn forgettable. There's no reason or need to get to know them. And when you're main character is just a nepo-baby, that's a problem.

At the very least they could have made Cora Harper an interesting character as the person who has trained her entire life only to be superceded by said nepo-baby. But nope...she's just immediately cool with it and all you can do is find her a fucking rose garden.

What...a....waste....

The only somewhat interesting characters that should have been fleshed out more was Sloane Kelly, the security chief who led the rebellion and became the head of the exiles. SHE could have had an interesting storyline in an Aria T'loak type of way. But she's just relegated to killing her in order to advance another boring plot.

I've played the trilogy multiple times with multiple different agendas for the character (today I'll be a racist like Ashley. Today I'll be smart-ass, etc...)

And the only hard-and-fast rule is "always...kill...Alenko".

I've actually gotten all the way up to Virmire multiple times with the intention being "okay...not this time." only to have the thought strike me right at the moment of truth that i still have two more games to go with him hanging around and at least the space racist has boobs to distract me.

Poor poor Kaiden.

Most IT nowadays is just simply the ability to google. What sets a professional IT person apart from an amateur is that the professional has an educated guess as to what to google in the first place.

Non-professional: "My computer is making a weird buzzing noise"

Professional: "What are the symptoms of a bad cooling fan?"

I guess they commonly know to use asterisks for italics and bold

I wouldn't guess that at all. Pretty much everyone I know in the "normie" world would AT BEST use ctrl-i and ctrl-b if they're not just pressing the icon in the gui.

Hell, most of them look at me like I'm a goddamn morlock when I tell them to Shift-delete in order to skip the recycling bin.

I'm going to cheat and say that with the exception of everyone's favourite space-racist, most of the side characters from the Mass Effect Trilogy are far more compelling than Commander Shepard.

Has anyone asked what your favourite dinosaur is yet?

For the most part, yes. By design. Conveying something in a movie is more challenging in that it has less time to do it than a book has less time to do it. So it HAS to be, to some degree, more blunt and on-the-nose than a book can take its time being.

You can write five pages of internal description discussing what your main character thinks about the world around them. But you can't show that in a movie and so you have to figure out how to get the gist of it across in a few lines of dialogue and some emoting.

It's why show don't tell is a rule. You have to simplify a movie in comparison to a book or else your audience will be sitting through a ten hour film.

When I thought the world had a future, I would have opted for cryogenics.

But I am 100% that we are on our way to the big reset button.

Not necessarily extinction, per se. But a societal bottleneck where a man-made catastrophe throws the survivors back technologically and we have to start the climb all over.

Getting past that point to the realm of actually achieving the technology necessary to unfreeze me seems unlikely. So cryogenics is just death with a preserved corpse.

I'll take death. The sooner the better, lately.

Trump will be dead and in the ground, either by bullet or by hamburger, long before any of this ever reaches the functional stage anyway. I can virtually guarantee it.

The very first thing written by a something called "proofreading services.com" is functionally wrong. That's a helluva start.

"exact" and "very accurate" are not the same thing. Not by a long shot.

"Very accurate" still leaves room for innacuracies while "Exact" does not. So why exactly would I trust a service whose very first sentence is an error?

I don't have negative sentiments towards A.I. I have negative sentiments towards the uses it's being put towards.

There are places where A.I can be super exciting and useful; namely places where the ability to quickly and accurately process large amounts of data can be critically life saving, ie) air traffic control, language translation, emergency response preparedness, etc...

But right now it's being used to paint shitty pictures so that companies don't have to pay actual artists.

If I had a choice, I'd say no AI in the arts; save it for the data processing applications and leave the art to the humans.