That's is one of major Lemmy flaw IMHO
They should have separated identification and content. Make a unified id system and then let people host their own communities on the federated level.
This would have been expecially important as you can't really move your account among instances, and would have make the registration process also much easier for normal users who just want to use the platform
It may be a cynical argument but... People who wrote Grundgesetz doesn't need to be elected anymore, people who does politics today, instead, needs to.
We live in a democracy, at the very end, the electorate is the true final judge.
yeah but how much more is Uranium if it's mined in Canada compared to the one from Niger or Russia?
Consider the cost from fuel is not mainly for uranium ore, but for fuel manufacturing and processing. Like taking the ore and transformer them in pellets fuel.
May uranium ore double in price the increase of cost for nuclear would be less than 0,005€/kWh
start producing energy in 10 years AND are massively expensive is just not a reasonable investment
How can Japan build a reactor in 36 month but we can't? How can other countries finance favouribly nuclear power (nuclear is the energy source that most of all the others suffer discount rated) but we can't?
Nuclear gave France one of the cheapest electricity price in Europe, but we don't want to retry because we don't feel we can achieve it?
Side note, solar panels have problems too as their carbon footprint could be 3 times higher than expected
So if the party's attitude to the constitution has been deemed hostile and it does indeed have the potential to upend democracy in Germany this should be the perfect time to ban this party.
Problem being, when one voter every 5 supports a party, it's not that simple as you're basically saying 20% of your entire population is unfit according to the constitution.
It's a suicide, politically speaking
let people reuse each other's melodies
I think this is an interesting example, because it's already like this. Songs reusing other sampled songs are released all the time, and it's all perfectly legal. Only making a copy is illegal. No one can sue you if you create a character that resembles mickey mouse, but you can't use mickey mouse.
And pharmaceutical patents serves the same scope, they encourage the company to release publicly papers, data and synthesis methods so that other people can learn and research can move faster.
And the whole point of this is exactly regulating AI like people, no one will come after you because you've read something and now you have an opinion about it, no body will get angry if you've saw an Instagram post and now you have some ideas for your art.
Of course the distinction between likeness and copy is not that defined, but that's part of the whole debacle
it's just not something you can extract easily in countries that care about their citizens so it'll always come from a shitty place
First two countries for known reserves are Australia and Canada, together they hold around 40% of all the uranium reserves of the planet. Uranium could also be extracted from seawater, obviously at a much higher price.
It's just that it's easier to extract it where exploitation rights for land is cheap. But that's unfortunately also true for many materials we need for renewables
What you mean with "becoming"?
I've always been a crochety asshole, it's just that growing old I'm accepting Squidward was right all along
I feel old
I feel so HECKING old
then go around selling Binbows and MSFT can't do anything about it
I think this already happen. A very practical example, windows GUI has been copied by many Linus distros. And with windows 11 there's clearly a reference to Apple MacOS GUI with a sparkling of Google material design.
Should apple and Google be able to sue Microsoft because it "copied" their work? Should Google be able to sue apple because they "copied" the notification drop-down in iOS?
As you say it's really a grey area because the only reason we consider AI code to be "regurgitated" while human code to be "inspired" is only because we give humans more recognition of their intellectual abilities.
I think the topic is more complex than that.
Otherwise you could say you'd rather stop posting creative endeavours entirely than simply let it be stolen and regurgitated by every single artist who use internet for references and inspiration.
There's not only the argument "but companies do so for profit" because many artist do the same, maybe they are designers, illustrators or other and you'll work will give them ideas for their commissions
Honestly even some environmentalists over here are against wind turbines because they say they are "unnatural" and as such they shouldn't have a place in woods and natural landscapes.
So at this point I'm starting to think we're doomed and fuck everything
I don't think the problem is much on the identification side, but on the communities one
Like, I can't access any community on .world while the instance is down