Are you saying he is stupid, because his claim is not true?
But if he thinks he has corrupted the system enough that it works, he is evil not stupid.
Are you saying he is stupid, because his claim is not true?
But if he thinks he has corrupted the system enough that it works, he is evil not stupid.
Why do you think this fungus would absorb more radiation than e.g. a similar volume of water?
Sony loves making their own custom formats.
Stuff is just getting more expensive, because of demand competition with AI. There is no reason to think that production for non-AI computing will ever hit literally zero.
Remember, the Trump administration has insisted it is not a war. I guess it is instead a 3 day special military operation?
And like Putin, Trump will keep doubling down forever, instead of rationally withdrawing from the war and thereby admitting defeat.
And what does that difference matter?
Trump apparently took the decision to go to war against Iran ignorant of the Iranian threat to close the Hormuz straight. Even I knew Iran would do that.
The whole reason to go to war with Iran was to stop the Iranian nuclear program... which Trump himself cancelled Obama's deal to stop.
Harris would not have been Bibi's little bitch.
There is no reason to think that Harris would have gone to war with Iran.
Well, enjoy your Iran war, after refusing to vote for Kamela Harris. Harris would not have invaded Iran.
So the title is
Group with GOP ties backs Green Party’s Jill Stein with ads, mail
Seems pretty direct to me, right?
ChatGPT foreslog mig "causal insinuation" som et navn på den retoriske manipulations-teknik som er brugt. Hvilket vist ikke er et officielt begreb, men virker som en ret god beskrivelse.
Sådan kan det læses - men titlen skriver ikke "fordi", så meget snævert læst er der ikke påstået årsagssammenhæng.
Det er selvfølgelig med vilje, at titelforfatterne har gjort dette. Meget lig Betteridge's law of headlines, hvor journalister har en tendens til at skrive spørgsmål, som de godt ved de ikke kan stå inde for. Titlen kunne lige så godt have været "Tabte Frederiksen valget, fordi hun stod fast mod Trump?".
Yup. 79% of Republicans approve of how Trump is handling the Iran War. No reasonable and informed person can hold that opinion - we are not dealing with serious people here.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3w384px52no