Kein Stroh 80? Komm schรถn... Amateure.
Lucky motherfucker.
Why are people so unfathomably dumb, like, I'm afraid.
I mean, OP wrote "simply the best pocket tool", which is arguably wrong. I had Swiss "army" knives as a kid (yeah, it was normal at the time, rounded tips and dulled blades weren't part of the offering) but the somewhat sharp blades would go dull in a matter of days (given how many sticks I would bring it to...), and they would invariably break after a while.
They are cheap, but their durability is somewhat relative, so you gotta keep buying them. Especially the models made with plastic exterior, since a single drop on a stone is often enough to break the shell off.
Now, as OP said, the simplest Swiss knife (with plastic shell) is 20 bucks. There isn't much you can get at this price point in the multitool universe. However, as written above, those are fragile, and the simplest with metal shell is 50 bucks (or slightly less if you dig a bit, but definitely over 40).
That would be the "Pioneer" with 8 "features", including a blade, an awl (reamer), two flat screwdrivers, a can opener, a bottle opener, a wire stripper and a key ring (apparently counts as a tool ๐). So really, 7 features, because I don't honestly consider a pinhole meant to pass a keyring in it as a "feature".
Now, the closest one can get to this price with leatherman is the Rev. It is also available at 50 bucks, but this one has 14 tools (two counted twice, so 12 really): Pliers, Wire Cutters, 420HC Knife, Package Opener, Wood/Metal File, Can Opener, Bottle Opener, Ruler (1.5 in | 3.8 cm), Phillips Screwdriver, Medium Screwdriver, Small Screwdriver, Wire Stripper. The belt/pocket clip isn't counted as a tool ๐คก. Unlike the Swiss Army Knives, Leatherman multi tools have locking blades, and are user serviceable, which is IMHO an absolute game changer (I cut myself more than once with a Swiss army knife folding back on my hand).
If you start searching for other brands, there are other seemingly good tools like the Gerber Suspension, at the same price point.
More like "Muskael J'actionne".
Thanks for showing me tinyeye ๐. I didn't know of it. All I can tell is that google image search, duckduckgo and all the other image search engines I tried failed at finding it.
Ah OK. My bad then. Probably someone that I inconvenienced elsewhere and who went through all my comments to downvote everything then ๐
Thanks for your answer. Yeah I can see how that can be annoying. I'll admit that I didn't upgrade in quite a while... So that might be why.
AN UNCOMMITTED MOVEMENT WILL NOT BE CALLED FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION, REGARDLESS OF THE RESULT OF THE PRIMARY.
First off, it better not. If you think "Genocide Joe" is bad for palestine, try "Bloodbath drumpf"... I mean, maybe it is better to die violently and fast than slowly? But either way, whatever the pro-palestine movement is after, the democrats are their best choice, and by far. The alternative not only got stronger ties with the netanyahu government, but also a much lower overall IQ, zero consideration for legislation, international agreements, humanitarian matters, and democracy in general (which they have literally confused with the opposition party, for decades by now). You might not like biden, but from a humanitarian PoV, he is orders of magnitude better than anyone the GoP might select (and especially more so if it is drumpf).
Second off, I get that people are trying to "send a message", but if it changes nothing aside from vanity numbers, it will have absolutely zero impact. The impact was "voting for Bernie", and that is about 8 years too late now.
Definitely more probable than 'boobies'
AFAIU - but that is a veeeeeery "skimmed" take on the issue, so please check what I wrote before taking it at face value:
There were legitimate concerns about tiktok (hugely popular platform distributed as a "black box", with very concerning permissions and behaviours, and owned by a foreign actor - tiktok is "unavailable" domestically - that demonstrably uses technology in an extremely dystopian way on their own population), so there was quite a lot of public pressure to "do something about it", and of course politicians jumped on the opportunity to make a (very) broadly fitting legislation targeting it, coincidentally also having utterly damaging and immensely concerning side-effects for the end users privacy and sovereignty of all applications.
Following that, some of the people got (rightly) concerned about the legislation's effect on their rights and privacy, but the vast majority just saw that their digital crack cocaine was being attacked, and started whining with arguments of varying relevance. At the end of the day, though, a given platform is irrelevant. What is, is the abilities given to the users, and the possibilities that those create. But now, we have a deeply concerning platform, still being immensely popular and uncontrolled; a totally unfitting legislation with incredibly wild "side effects"; and a growing, misguided popular movement to "save tiktok" that will only make a legitimate attempt at mitigating it much harder. Yay.
Edit: after quite some digging, I found the bill here (PDF) - source.
Edit 2: to answer your question more directly:
Can anyone get me up to speed what claims the bill gave to justify TikTok must be either sold or remove from app stores?
The justification is "Americaโs foremost adversary has no business controlling a dominant media platform in the United States".
Which is IMHO fair. It isn't like the CCP would let American corporations, let alone government controlled ones, run services in China, let alone psychiatrically alienate their citizens, instigate discord and radicalization, potentially manipulate the public opinion, have the capacity to covertly do psyops, and actively, aggressively collect any and all data.
The potential problem I see (and probably what concerns most of the privacy advocates out there) however, is that while the bill is aiming at tiktok in particular (fine), it also targets any "foreign adversary". Meaning that, AFAIU (but IANAL), all the US would have to do to completely and entirely nuke an app (or an entire federated platform!) in the US would be to declare any foreign entity (country, state, corporation, person, etc) their "adversary". Effectively giving them a single "button" to directly nuke any app and services they don't see fit. No matter how legitimate.
Right, anytime anyone fucks up it's sarcasm, anytime anyone is dumb, it's a joke, nothing is real, everything is a cake.