2xsaiko

joined 2 years ago
[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

It also doesn’t work yet, I tried it. Maybe that’s because of my unusual language settings though (German region with English system language and Siri).

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

You’re in Germany? I read about all the hurdles and just went with DIY because I didn’t want to deal with all that. Maybe in the future I will go the official route but even then I feel like it will be worse than what I currently have in terms of HRT.

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tbh I just bought from a high rated seller with a lot of reviews and that’s it

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I still love the dualshock 3. Recently bought two more from ebay because my first one is half broken.

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Okay, to avoid confusion maybe I should use the same term you used, which is sexual preference, and not sexual orientation. This is what I'm talking about (from your OP):

The second part is sexual prefernces. I do not know much about sex or sexual preferences. I am a young adult, and have not had to know about this for any person that I have met yet. I have never had the interest to know about this for someone, neither have I retained this information. I understand that if you are looking out for partner/s, then you would have to share this, so we would have to use some words for it. But why do we have to keep this as a part of gender. As in, why would I want to share this information with my governments (who do census), or for my visa applications. Should this not just be something personal?

The only one who talks about this in the linked comment chain is the other person, and only tangentially.

So, again I suppose, in which way do you think this is part of gender?

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah. I think sex as a general classifier is not very useful, both in a colloquial and also medical context. I know that firsthand due to taking HRT, which already causes very medically relevant changes but of course not across the board for all sexual characteristics. But I wanted to keep it relatively short :)

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Hm, where? I only saw you talk about gender vs sex, for which there is no difference in my native language either. And they certainly are closely related to the point where the majority of people identify as the gender corresponding to their sex.

However sexual orientation (such as “straight” or “gay” or “aroace” for example) is an entirely different thing as it describes your attraction to other people.

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 1 month ago (14 children)

Sexual orientation is not part of gender! In which way do you think it is?

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Probably not, the costs were essentially just sticking ethernet ports on the walls next to the phone ports and rewiring the existing wires to those ports. And back when this was done (whenever we got DSL, around 2005 maybe?) fiber tech was probably prohibitively expensive. I haven’t looked up how much fiber modems cost but it would probably be more expensive even today.

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The phone lines repurposed as ethernet in my parents’ house also only do 100 Mb/s. I concur, so painful. I want to put a storage server there but no matter where it’s limited by awful speeds. It also means getting faster internet would be useless because it would be limited by these wires.

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 month ago

Oh gee I wonder why depressed kids are increasingly online where they are more free to express themselves, in a society where mental health problems are very stigmatized and confiding in someone that you want to kill yourself can get you imprisoned.

Also, related post on the general concept of internet addiction and ~~gambling~~ social media addiction.

txttletale:

pun-ishment888:

txttletale:

txttletale:

going to bat for the concept of internet addiction as someone under 80 is spectacularly funny

damn people are spending a lot of time on the combination newspaper/public square/vast searchable library of incomprehensible amounts of information/storefront/private communications/some people's actual job technology. presumably there is some nefarious Scary Pathological Aspect to this,

Imagine if you called gambling addiction "addiction to going outside" and doomed the discourse to constantly bounce between "ok SOME outside activities are bad, you need to have a good relationship with how you interact" and "theres nothing wrong with going outside dumbass"

"gambling addiction" is an invention of the gambling industry leveraged to pathologise the human misery inflicted on purpose as part of their business model and divert discussions of that misery and suffering away from regulatory and political interventions that could prevent that harm and towards biomedicalized management of those experiencing that (again--foreseeable, inevitable, industry-working-as-intended) harm

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

It’s a thing in Bavaria as well. I’m trying to erase it from my vocabulary because I hate it too.

view more: ‹ prev next ›