The Greens also have a terrible name, they're a left wing party that don't particularly care about environmental issues. Meanwhile the Lib Dems just stand for whatever the government doesn't, which changes depending on who's in power.
1rre
joined 2 years ago
Nope.
I love induction hobs, electric cars & planes, xenon spacecraft and all that, but even if we get to interstellar travel, there's going to be a frontier where people are going to be using the lowest maintenance, easiest way to generate immediate heat, even if it's from solar/fusion powered hydrogen or ethanol generators. It's just a lot easier to store and release small but much larger than instantaneous generation amounts of energy as flammable substances than in batteries or pumped storage or whatever else.
If we don't get to interstellar travel, I expect we'll still have the same in remote regions on earth/our solar system.
Burning things for heat is never going away as long as humans are around, there's always going to be someone "off-grid" which means you're more than likely gonna be burning something for cooking and warmth (ie heat)
Issue is Hamas are the government of Gaza, and it's pretty hard to get past that.
Plus the same people can't tell the difference between Israel and Jews in general so maybe it's just a lack of comprehension and reasoning.
Idk about you but if the government took 24% of my money I'd be ecstatic, currently it's much closer to 55-60%, a too-big percentage of which goes on privatising profit and nationalising losses.
nah unfortunately not from the looks of things, there's some places which definitely had mad cow disease that aren't coloured, but I wouldn't be surprised if the actual map is still very correlated
there's a gap on both, just in different places and you can get from one to the other just by sliding. The constraints are elsewhere so wouldn't allow you to twist.
It is a different definition, but it's the same unit... it's also more like saying "that ball of yarn is 10 metres" - the ball itself isn't 10 metres long in any dimension, but the meaning is clear given the context, as it would if you said "it's 0.05 metres". By having two meanings distinguishable by context, it seems like two definitions to me.
So for context, I'm an asexual guy who had one girl in his classes at high school & went to a 75% male university on a course that was 94% male...
Right after graduating I had the same issues you're describing, just from "new experiences" more than anything, but when you go out into the world and start interacting with people you'll be fine - it's somewhat normal especially if you didn't have a drive to seek out women previously or even just didn't have the self confidence to
Also though, that sounds like a bit of a weird interaction as an introvert anyway, I don't think I'd have been super comfortable either way as I'd be expecting to be robbed or scammed or something, but if someone is expressing interest in something you're passionate about then they very clearly want to hear about it, so just say things about it even if it's cringe or not perfect
Human energy needs are incredibly variable so the estimates for normal consumption are wrong for most people, but when you get into essential systems (basically cardiovascular and nervous, not even including digestive or any muscle movement) you actually need even less - the average (by weight, height & age) man needs 1950kcal or so and the average woman (by height, weight & age) needs 1450kcal or so
When we replace AI with brains in jars I'm sure we can cut it down even more though
The problem is time.
You're just considering human spaceflight. Keeping humans alive and equally importantly sane for years is very different to sending a probe somewhere, and we've been getting better at the latter