1rre

The $1m isn't in cash... You forget that the average house price in London is around $900k, and for Sydney it's $981k.

That means your pool for your car, furnishings, investments etc. are either minimal, or you have a mortgage, and definitely can't live passively off $30-40k per year unless you're living in cheaper than average housing (one would call this "not super wealthy") and definitely not if you're supporting a family.

I'm not saying the cost of living isn't worse in the US, just that $1m is a comparatively tiny amount everywhere and that most millionaires (as there will a correlation between net worth and frequency) are frankly closer to the working class than they are to billionaires.

Most, sure, but Europe, Korea, Japan, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand and more are still a significant part of the world where $1M puts you firmly in the same "well-off and comfortable, but certainly not rich in the way billionaires are" territory you'd be in the US

Worldwide, I think it's definitely safe to say most millionaires' lifestyles are much closer to average than they are to billionaires' (ie still having to make regular payments for housing, but mortgage rather than rent, and still having to perform most tasks for themselves rather than having PAs to do it for them)

Would it though?

If the requirement is "worth paying 50% more for than the average worker" then instead of picking someone worse for cheaper at random then you're making sure that only jobs where there likely isn't an adequate supply for due to how bell curves work,

The H1-B visa is fundamentally broken (or working exactly as intended, depending on how you look at it) though, so you apply for just under 10x as many as you need and end up with the number you want.

It's not Microsoft's fault the US Government is actively encouraging importing cheaper, average employees by using a lottery rather than filtering based on "you must earn n% more than the median income in that sector" or a similar metric to avoid reducing wages for Americans and companies using them to cut costs...

That's one interpretation and implementation of free speech. The EU define it as "freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers." which would be very easy to argue includes public authorities altering the legality of receiving and/or imparting information via AI.

They're popular because they're broadly appealing and inoffensive, so for people who are passionate about music they're likely comparatively boring, whereas people who don't really care about music aren't going to go out of their way to support or defend them.

One of three:

• People whose cultures didn't value them/were disconnected from the original creators eg. Egypt
• People who ran empires and were just going to destroy them for a new palace or something anyway eg. Ottomans in Greece
• People who were forced to give them up in the face of a much stronger miltary power eg. a lot of the Chinese & Indian stuff

I don't think there's anything unethical about keeping 1 and 2 as they wouldn't exist otherwise, but 3 should be returned and replaced with other items from the collection or replicas

looks like a zoom + colour change of his left foot (on the right side of the image)?

Where's the AI artwork?

yep, that would pass the criteria

Plausibly it's trying to minimise land area with some degree of contiguity so it's not just picking random cities though. India's economy isn't much bigger than the 5th or 6th economy while having substantially more territory and population.

Very good point, but oxygen is very abundant and you'll more than likely already have oxygen generators with a level of redundancy, or be in an atmosphere with oxygen.

Also for load balancing you could constantly be splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen, then react them back into water when you need a large amount of energy at once as an alternative to electrical batteries which degrades less over time, if heat is all you want at least.

All I'm saying is there's so many applications that we're never going to get to a level of 0.