10A

joined 2 years ago
[–] 10A@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (35 children)

Fascists haven't existed since 25 Luglio in 1943. You can find a tiny number of exceptions over the years, but as a broad statement it's true. I'm not old enough to have argued with fascists, and I bet you're not either.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Yes, everyone whose point of view differs from yours must obviously be inferior to you.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Sure, and I could have chosen any other action, but I chose murder because it's not contentious to express a disapproval of it.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Except really, nobody's ever debating anyone's right to exist. That's absurd.

Consider this: If a mass murderer was captured and imprisoned, he could claim that the justice system opposes his right to exist. The trouble with that is he'd be completely incorrect. The justice system opposes his behavior of murder. No matter how much he believes his very existence is inextricably bound to his behavior of murder, the reality is he murders by choice, and it is that intentional action which the justice system opposes.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

I only know about them because I subscribe to m/kbinMeta. If you stick to your subscribed magazines, as I do, you only hear those to whom you intentionally listen.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (14 children)

What kind of absurd hyperbole is that? Nobody has called for murder. And certainly nobody has committed a murder based on a call for it.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

Have you never heard "sticks and stones may break my bones, but names can never hurt me"? It's preschool 101. Speech is never an act of violence.

Additionally, nobody is debating anyone's right to exist.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (30 children)

A group of patrons sitting at a table in a bar, quietly discussing their TERF perspective, is entirely different from one of them walking up to a trans table and picking a fight. The former is an exercise of free speech, whereas the latter is cause for ejection.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It's not at all ludicrous to conceive that I may be wrong on any topic. I enjoy learning something new when I'm disproven. It's not easy to convince me (or anyone else for that matter) that I'm wrong, but I'm generally open to the possibility.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (41 children)

I was active in r/Conservative, and here I'm the primary contributer to m/Conservative. Hi, nice to meet you. When I'm engaged in arguments involving the word "fascist", it's rarely me using that word (unless we're literally discussing Mussolini), and usually me who's called that for favoring levelheaded conservative principles. I enjoy mutually respectful debate, but I find most others prefer to fearfully call me a "fascist," downvote everything I've ever written, block me, and walk away feeling sanctimonious.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

The "far right" is growing because the left keeps moving further left, and normal people realize they're now considered conservative.

If you want an echo chamber, go on and kick me out. You reap what you sow.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (132 children)

New Yorkers who are relatively apolitical tend to vote Democrat just because that's the culturally normal thing to do there. As more and more of them witness the disaster of illegal immigration, I see two possible outcomes: either 1. they start to vote for conservatives, or 2. they pressure Democrat leadership to abandon their pro-illegal policy, and start deporting all of these criminals.

Related: Tiny Texas Border Town Really Sorry To Hear About New York City Struggling With A Few Thousand Migrants

view more: ‹ prev next ›