0x0

joined 2 years ago
[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Someone called me a cat dad and it sounded so weird to me. I like to think that my cats view me as "big friend". I'm no father, more of a guardian who wants what's best for my silly creatures and would die for them if it came down to it, but certainly not a father, no siree.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 months ago

If you work for a publicly traded company and wish to become radicalized, you can divide the year's profits (plus money wasted on stock buybacks) by the number of employees to roughly estimate your personal green circle.

You might even add the CEO's compensation to the numerator. I hear LLMs are ready for prime time.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago

The fact she even answered the question is damning, then on top of it, that's the answer she picked.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It should be noted that "strong typing" and "weak typing" don't have the same precise definition as static/dynamic typing.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Well they're not metal detectors, now are they? (This fact brought to you by Detectorists on BBC Four.)

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't get the concern trolling?

This implies to me that you disagree with the post, which says corporations are deliberately deskilling people with LLMs.

But others losing their coding skills because they are lazy? I don't know if that's even a problem. Those that want to learn learn. Those who do not, will never code.

I agree, and am skeptical that LLMs will make people lose their skills.

So, I don't think corporations are de-skilling people.

My point of clarification is that I think they are de-valuing their labor.

None of my comment is indicative of being even close to what strawman argument you are hating on

What's the strawman argument?

I do not hate you! Why do you keep repeating that?

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

No hate over here. I don't even disagree with you. I just found it funny that you're so vehemently arguing that vibe coding won't rot your brain, but you tried to express it with a nonsensical "if then" statement.

Edit: To clarify, I do think there's a concerted effort to devalue software engineers. CEOs are pretending that junior engineers can be replaced by LLMs and that senior engineers can get more done in less time with LLMs. I'm deeply skeptical of these claims, and I think they're lying through their teeth in order to drive their stock prices up in the short term, and software engineer salaries down in the medium/long term. So, I don't think LLMs are as competent as they claim. I also don't think they'll rot your brain if you choose to "vibe code".

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago (5 children)

If it's so bad, use it, if you don't want to, don't.

Sounds like the kind of logic a vibe coder would write 🤔

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I'm no AI proponent, but I'll only believe that LLMs are causing this psychosis when I see a randomized controlled trial. Until then, it seems far more plausible that people experiencing delusions gravitate towards LLMs.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago

Lieutenant Commander Dat Ass

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

A watched pot always boils?

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago

They must keep their mouths open more than normal frogs just so they can see. Poor creatures.

view more: ‹ prev next ›