01189998819991197253

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] 01189998819991197253 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Ok cool. I'll give this one a try. I use whatever came with the printer (webuilder, I think it's called), and it's not great.

[–] 01189998819991197253 2 points 4 months ago

Two centers?? We are in unprecedented times!

[–] 01189998819991197253 1 points 4 months ago (5 children)

What do you use?

[–] 01189998819991197253 1 points 4 months ago

Cybersecurity startup AISLE

Spelled ezel, but pronounced aisel, it means ass in dutch lol

[–] 01189998819991197253 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Be honest. Is she right?

[–] 01189998819991197253 3 points 4 months ago

“Bill Gates was bitching about us changing JS all the time,” Eich later recalled of the fall of 1996.

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

[–] 01189998819991197253 1 points 4 months ago

Indeed! I went through so many calculators, and I missed something someone.

[–] 01189998819991197253 1 points 4 months ago

Because I ate the third one.

[–] 01189998819991197253 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm not a fan, either. And, the thing is, we've seen similar companies pop up out of nowhere that claim to be private, but are just honeypots. The fbi did one once, and there is nothing stopping them from doing it again.

I thought about this a lot, and came to the inevitable conclusion that not naming the angel investor is the same as naming them as a government organization or an organization that makes money from privacy erosion. He didn't say it wasn't any of them, which lends to the conclusion that it is, in fact, one of those organizations.

[–] 01189998819991197253 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Thanks!

It is puzzling. I finished reading the article, and it could be that Calyx was doing things Nick didn't like, so left (as opposed to Nick doing things that Calyx didn't like). But, without his statement, it's their word against his silence. If this phone company is genuinely what he states, it could be a game changer. But I'm not going to trust it at all, until it's fully proven and he comes out with his statement.

[–] 01189998819991197253 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

What were their (Tommy Web and Oliver Scott) official statements on the matter? I mean, besides the generic one that Chiryu gave of them having different goals/visions. Or was that it? If so, it seems that Calyx wanted to continue with providing their privacy products and Nick maybe didn't fully agree with that, and, so, they parted ways. Now he has a carrier. Seems off.

[–] 01189998819991197253 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Few is three or more. You have a couple twix up your sleeve.

view more: ‹ prev next ›