01189998819991197253

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] 01189998819991197253 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's also better specs that some software and security processes require, but yeah, it's mostly marketing and it sucks.

[–] 01189998819991197253 2 points 1 year ago

No lol I just channeled my inner 90s hahahaa

[–] 01189998819991197253 5 points 1 year ago

!jerboa@lemmy.ml

[–] 01189998819991197253 6 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I almost got the N95 back in the day, bit it didn't work with my provider. This project is hella wicked

[–] 01189998819991197253 1 points 1 year ago

And this tax needs to increase 25% every 6 months until it's no longer empty.

[–] 01189998819991197253 1 points 1 year ago

That's a fair point.

[–] 01189998819991197253 1 points 1 year ago

Fight Club style. If you're able to keep yourself from assimilating or being discovered, it could work.

[–] 01189998819991197253 3 points 1 year ago

I agree completely with your comment. Including the rage at the end lol

[–] 01189998819991197253 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean... the government already has all your information. If you distrust them with your information, you have an odd problem to overcome. The corpos, however, shouldn't have all this data on you.

[–] 01189998819991197253 1 points 1 year ago

For every rental, there is at least one landlord. In and of itself, this isn't a bad thing. Some people don't want to own homes, and would rather rent. There should be that option. Option. Not the only possibility. There are not enough ownable homes, because too many are owned by investment firms that keep them deliberately empty to drive up prices. Real estate investing should be heavily regulated, and, yes, this includes over landlords.

[–] 01189998819991197253 4 points 1 year ago

To fit more units, and make more money.

view more: ‹ prev next ›