00

joined 2 years ago
[–] 00@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

relatively high humidty, light/mid wind strength. I guess both of them count against a jacket lol

[–] 00@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

The ultimate question would be whether anyone had the soft- or hard-power to stop them if they wanted to, which might be doubtful. But like @Monologue said, it wouldnt be in their interest. Keeping everyone tied to them and their services is far more profitable than actually using hard power to stomp out projects that steal comparatively little from their profit margins. But profit margins are profit margins, so further changes to make Chromium/Chrome even more of a spyware while booting out forks is just a double win.

[–] 00@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Small server (for now 👀)

[–] 00@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Even if its not affected by manifest V3 changes directly, we shouldnt forget what V3 means. It shows the direction that Google wants to take Chromium into, unsurprisingly. Google is an Ad company, making a browser that has ad-blocking or has forks (i.e. Brave) that focus on ad-blocking is against its very core goal. Manifest V3 could just be the start. We dont know what changes they have in mind that could be impossible to evade for comparatively small projects like Brave. Imagine important and big features and security updates shipped with spyware so deeply integrated that only a giant company like Google could implement it while making it impossible for any smaller company like Brave to divide. Brave would be dead over night.

[–] 00@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Agreed. But while I enjoy it in the moment, Im a bit afraid we could lose it. And Im not sure what we have to do to keep it this way.

Edit: also hiiiiiii

[–] 00@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

What do you think about the Fairphone 3? Is it a respectable daily driver?

[–] 00@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Eh, Brave has some things going for it, like its search engine which is apparently quite good. On the other hand its still chromium and thus legitimizes the Google Monopoly. Besides that, the crypto bs they have pushed in the past and the past monetary contributions to homophobic causes by the founder are a red flag as well.

For easy plug-and-play Librewolf and Mullvad Browser are probably the best. Although for most people it would probably make sense to enable specific cookies for sites they visit often so they stay logged in. Though there are probably easy tutorials for that online. Or, even better, use a password manager like bitwarden and install its respective browser plugin.

[–] 00@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

And im a bit jealous of @0x. The grass is always greener on the other side.

[–] 00@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

Absolutely. And even if people stepped up, theres a ton of institutional knowledge that they would loose. This might even lead to some of the people that stepped up quitting, making the situation even worse.

[–] 00@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Mom says its my turn on the account naming scheme!

[–] 00@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Ease of use is such a sad argument as well. Linux Mint or Ubuntu would be more than enough for most Windows use cases and are probably more intuitive. Yes, differently, but definitely more intuitive.

[–] 00@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Google Maps, Apple Maps, Organic Maps and OSMAnd+. Although Im very willing to admit that "best" is highly dependent on my rather specific personal preferences. Being FOSS gives OSMAnd+ a big plus (hehe), but I also have an interest in GIS, which it is quite good in, since its a rather information dense app. From the sometimes absurd categories that you can search for (e.g. "abandoned", which is great to search for Urbex targets). I also love the bonkers level of personalization you can achieve with OSMAnd+, considering that the alternatives have very little options on mobile phones.

view more: ‹ prev next ›