Infosec.Pub

4,649 readers
117 users here now

To support infosec.pub, please consider donating through one of the following services:

Paypal: jerry@infosec.exchange

Ko-Fi: https://ko-fi.com/infosecexchange

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/infosecexchange

founded 2 years ago
ADMINS
1
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/technology by /u/chrisdh79 on 2025-03-04 00:42:28+00:00.

Original Title: Judges Are Fed up With Lawyers Using AI That Hallucinate Court Cases | Another lawyer was caught using AI and not checking the output for accuracy, while a previously-reported case just got hit with sanctions.

2
 
 

Another lawyer was caught using AI and not checking the output for accuracy, while a previously-reported case just got hit with sanctions.

3
 
 

But the explanation and Ramirez’s promise to educate himself on the use of AI wasn’t enough, and the judge chided him for not doing his research before filing. “It is abundantly clear that Mr. Ramirez did not make the requisite reasonable inquiry into the law. Had he expended even minimal effort to do so, he would have discovered that the AI-generated cases do not exist. That the AI-generated excerpts appeared valid to Mr. Ramirez does not relieve him of his duty to conduct a reasonable inquiry,” Judge Dinsmore continued, before recommending that Ramirez be sanctioned for $15,000.

Falling victim to this a year or more after the first guy made headlines for the same is just stupidity.

view more: next ›