this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
51 points (94.7% liked)

politics

25874 readers
3107 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This sounds great. Protestors will come. It'll cement the link between Netanyahu and anyone who feels like sticking up for him in public, damaging that person's reputation. Presumably he will take no questions, but he won't be able to avoid the obvious questions that will arise, and the news coverage.

Let's get him on the first plane and have members of the house GOP meet him at the airport. Sounds great.

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It would be very hard for anyone to deny who's in lock step with bibi's government. Don't know that the US media won't sucker punch us with a victim story though.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 8 points 2 years ago

If I had more faith in the media, I would say that their "we have to cover both sides of every issue" pathology would work in our favor on this issue

However, I believe that there would magically be no need to cover both sides of every issue in this case, because it was always just a smokescreen to justify airing some bullshit that they can't justify in any other way. So depending on the media you might be right yes.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

All they have is theatre. They are more ideologically and morally bankrupt than No Labels.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So, does the "G" in "GOP" stand for GeNoCiDe now, or are we only doing that with Joe?

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Now if only we could arrest him for violating international law while he was here…

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

Citizen's arrest?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Guys, I’m starting to wonder if the GQP house are just a bunch of goddamned morons.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They're useful idiots for fascists.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It can be two things.

[–] NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Bibi is obviously evil, but also a moron if he does this. Electorally, if Bibi wants Trump back in the Whitehouse, one the better strategies to do that is keep democrats divided on Isreal. In other words, Bibi hugging Biden drives progressives away from Biden, hurts enthusiasm, reduces Dem turnout, all good things for Trump. Bibi coming to speak to the Republican conference (he is already meeting with Republican senators today virtually) only serves to make support for Isreal more partisan by pissing off Dems and aligning them against Isreal. Not to mention pissing off Biden who he needs.

I guess the strategy is to scare Biden and Dems into supporting Isreal more to stave off attacks from Republicans who would be viewed as more supportive of Isreal by voters? Sounds like a dumb move, public opinion is turning against Isreal, and an invasion of Rafaku isn't going to make Isreal any more sympathetic to the average non racist and non biblical prophecy believing voter. Again, Republicans attacking Biden for not supporting genocide enough only serves to shore up Bidens base, and independent looking at the chaos and suffering in Gaza aren't going to ding Biden for not being Bibi's bitch.

Would be a dumb move I reckon.