this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
83 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22212 readers
25 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 52 points 1 year ago

Libs get mad about the things they support all the time. Go ask libs in the 80s how they felt about our brave Mujahideen fighters for instance. Ask libs in 20 years how they feel about all the nazis in Ukraine they've spent the last couple of years arming to the teeth. When you live in idealism rather than materialism your viewpoints change with the wind

[–] Zuzak@hexbear.net 42 points 1 year ago

Liberals don't do historical analysis, they just chase after the shiny red dot wherever the state department points the laser pointer. These people have blind faith that US-backed regime change can solve every problem and simply ignore all the times it's failed or created new problems. Deeply unserious people.

[–] Red_Sunshine_Over_Florida@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The average Westerner is mad at Putin because the TV man told them to be that way. If Navalny had somehow managed to unseat him but, still piss off the West for whatever reason, the TV man would do a 180 and tell everybody in America to be mad at Navalny.

[–] milistanaccount09@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

listen sweaty, liberals correctly understand that systems only do what the great men in charge of them want them to do (this does not apply to Joe Biden!), and Putin is a Very Bad Man

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

They thought he'd let them keep plundering Russia as a neocolony. He didn't.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

"No, not like that."

Serious answer:

  1. Putin and, under him, Russia don't seem to be getting on board with the neoliberal hegemony of capitalism.
  2. Russia is large enough, that by not getting on board, it is a threat to that hegemony.
  3. Russia has been a scapegoat for so long that I don't think it ever can't be. These prejudices become institutionalized and the enemies and victims never really become laundered of the roles they've been assigned.
[–] SaniFlush@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago

You expect them to remember something which was in the news over a decade ago? Neoliberals do t have a past or a future, just an eternal now like a fish

[–] Owl@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

History began with the current news cycle.

[–] thebartermyth@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"hand picked" citations-needed

I know it's a bit, but ppl really do be saying this lol

[–] reaper_cushions@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean, he was hand picked by the guy the west had hand picked. You could say he was second hand picked.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

And considering Russia was a client state of the US at the time, Bill Clinton was 100% involved and signed off on all of it.

[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

I didn't pick putin, i would've picked more ussr

[–] DickFuckarelli@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

GW stared into his eyes and saw his soul, or some shit.