this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
27 points (93.5% liked)

Canada

10434 readers
489 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It's an utter failure of the Canadian MSM that people still think the freedumm caravan had anything to do with truckers or mandates. This group of organizers set out to perform a CPC endorsed Jan 6th styled event intended to take over our Parliament building and end our democracy. They failed, but It's still treasonous.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lawyers for Lich and Barber accused the Crown of "cherry-picking" evidence, while prosecutors accused the defence of the same.

They aren't going to bring their own evidence. Doesn't sound much like cherry-picking to me. Sounds like the evidence (probably mostly from social media and captured by the chuds in the convoy) is pretty complete. But what do I know.

[–] Tramort@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago

Right?

"You've selectively chosen the evidence that is most damning, but it's an incomplete picture!"

"That's correct. This is an adversarial legal proceeding, where we select and present the most compelling evidence of guilt, and you select and present the most exculpatory evidence... would you like to present any evidence?"

"No thanks, we rest."

[–] datavoid@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Reminds of the one nutjob in my city who stands on a bridge all day with huge sign saying "Tamara Lich is innocent" while he swings his Canadian flag and salutes traffic. He makes me so fucking mad 🙂

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

In BC there are still crazy people who stand on the overpass on highway 1 with various signs like Trudeau is a liar, or vaccines are fake, etc. changes every week what the theme is.

Can't imagine how they have nothing better to do with their time.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

My prediction: They're going to get off with a fine or a stern warning. The courts seem to be swinging more in their favour these days for some stupid reason.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Tamara Lich and Chris Barber are charged with mischief, intimidation and offences related to counselling others to break the law during the protest that took over downtown Ottawa for more than three weeks in early 2022.

Crown prosecutors Tim Radcliffe and Siobhain Wetscher argued the case is not about Lich and Barber's political views, but instead how they "crossed the line" in committing the crimes they're accused of.

They used police and resident testimony, hours of video evidence, and mountains of social media content and text messages to argue the two accused had control and influence over the protest.

Defence lawyers have argued throughout the trial that Lich and Barber worked with police and city officials, and remained peaceful during their time in Ottawa.

Arrested Feb. 17, 2022 — one day before police started clearing downtown streets of people protesting COVID-19 rules and airing anti-government grievances — Lich and Barber have travelled to Ottawa from western Canada to attend their trial in person.

Meant to decide whether — and if so, how — the two should be punished for their role in the weeks-long protest that clogged the city's core and shook many residents, the trial has been slowed by legal wrangling, technical delays, unprepared witnesses and issues over how police evidence was disclosed.


The original article contains 465 words, the summary contains 212 words. Saved 54%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!