this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024

1004 points (98.5% liked)

News

37030 readers

2334 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

1004

Missouri law bars divorce during pregnancy – even in cases of violence (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

199 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The statute, which can lead to reproductive coercion in a state that has banned abortion, has recently gained nationwide attention

At six months pregnant, H decided enough was enough. She had endured years of abuse from her husband and had recently discovered he was also physically violent towards her child. She contacted an attorney to help her get a divorce.

But she was stopped short. Her lawyer told her that she could not finalize a divorce in Missouri because she was pregnant. “I just absolutely felt defeated,” she said. H returned to the house she shared with her abuser, sleeping in her child’s room on the floor and continuing to face violence. On the night before she gave birth, she slept in the most secure room in the house: on the tile floor in the basement, with the family’s dogs.

Under a Missouri statute that has recently gained nationwide attention, every petitioner for divorce is required to disclose their pregnancy status. In practice, experts say, those who are pregnant are barred from legally dissolving their marriage. “The application [of the law] is an outright ban,” said Danielle Drake, attorney at Parks & Drake. When Drake learned her then husband was having an affair, her own divorce stalled because she was pregnant. Two other states have similar laws: Texas and Arkansas.

(page 2) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (4 children)

tardmerica strikes again

who can stop them in their spree of retardation??

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

I don't particularly like calling christofascists that. They know exactly what they are doing.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

This isn’t new - it’s the case in multiple states and has been for a while. The justification is that usually the husband is assumed to be the “father” for the purpose of the birth certificate. It’s bullshit but Y’all’queda has been running Missouri for a loooong time

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] TDCN@feddit.dk 13 points 2 years ago

Isn't this a TV series on netflix... Oh yeah The Handmaid's Tale...

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

The "we just want to stop wh*res to use abortion as birth control" crowd does not stop at just abortion...

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

Blessed be the fruit.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

“Proud Slave State” Missouri has that law??

Weird.

[–] Zengen@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Sounds like these southern courts should meet the peoples militia.

[–] SteefLem@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

So Idiocracy and Handmaids tale are manuals now.

[–] GrymEdm@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I adore a lot of individual Americans. Some of the best people I know have lived their entire lives in the USA. But for the last 20 or so years official US policy decisions have become harder and harder to agree with and this is an example of that. So many US citizens are better than their system - they really need to demand a change to politicians/justice systems/etc that better represent them.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Doxatek@mander.xyz 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was wanting to move to Missouri so my commute to work wouldn't be as long as it is but every time I hear something of the states politics recently it's something horrible

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments