The current legal situation is that "art" generated by non-humans ("AI", stable diffusion, etc.) cannot have a copyright claimed on them. Therefore they are free to copy from the AI's operator and are not legally theft. However, the original artists the model files were trained on were not compensated for their work, so you'd technically be kind of stealing from them. As an illegalist, it's important to me to verify that my actions are actually illegal, and not merely based.
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
25 points (100.0% liked)
videos
22656 readers
1 users here now
Breadtube if it didn't suck.
Post videos you genuinely enjoy and want to share, duh. Celebrate the diversity of interests shared by chapochatters by posting a deep dive into Venetian kelp farming, I dunno. Also media criticism, bite-sized versions of left-wing theory, all the stuff you expected. But I am curious about that kelp farming thing now that you mentioned it.
Low effort / spam videos might be removed, especially weeb content.
There is a cytube that you can paste videos into and watch with whoever happens to be around. It's open submission unless there's something important to commandeer it with at the time.
A weekly watch party happens every Saturday (Sunday down under), with video nominations Saturday-Monday, voting Monday-Thursday. See the pin for whatever stage it's currently in.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I never heard about them coming out as non binary. Go James! (Stephanie?) Anyway I've been a fan of theirs since they were like the best reason to go to destructoid back in the day. I should listen to them more now that she's on her own
Every monday.
havent watched the vid but to me any AI generated 'art' is public domain.
Nothing like a solid Stephanie rant on the evils of capitalism to start my week.
I found a YouTube link in your post. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: