Lies go around the world a dozen times before the truth laces up its running shoes.
Most people don’t pay close attention to politics. Or anything really. A retraction may as well not exist for -80% of the population.
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
413 points (100.0% liked)
politics
25290 readers
3434 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This isn't even a retraction. She structured it as anyone who thought she meant differently is just silly. And then quickly transitions into present tense language about trafficking in the same fake voice she used for her speech.
I'm not sure if she's lying deliberately as much as she's just that ill-informed and uneducated, and rewarded for shooting from the hip (sometimes literally). It's part of the way these ideas and groups self-perpetuate.
But yeah, intentional or not, it's the bullshit asymmetry principle as well. It takes 10x the work to debunk bullshit as it does to create it.
"Shooting from the hip."
This speech was vetted by an entire committee. It wasn't just her speaking for herself; she was the voice of the entire Party.
They're hoping that the faithful will be motivated by the speech, and figure that they won't know/won't care when the truth comes out.
Not gonna lie, I thought Alabama Senator meant she was on the Alabama State Senate. Which made more sense but it still does make sense now that I know, sadly.
I’m sure Fox, OAN, and RT will really grill her about this and their viewing audiences will view her with skepticism in the future. /s
In fairness it was on Fox she was called out and admitted it. I was quite surprised.
The news desk, or prime time?
Not familiar with Fox at all tbh. It's shown in that video clip in the linked CNN page. Looks like it aired Sunday.
I guess the point is that stuff at the news desk doesn’t get a lot of air time, but it does usually cover the news a lot straighter than their prime time blocks, which spend a lot of time on spin.
Ah. That makes sense. Thanks.
I hate this kind of news. We don't need her say-so to realize she was lying.
I like this kind of news because it gets her on the record for lying. Too often in this modern world GOP politicians just keep lying until journalists give up on asking. She has admitted to lying.
I like this kind of news because it gets her on the record for lying.
Page A1, National Headline, 40pt Font: "After Failed Immigration Policy, Will Biden Apologize To 12-Year-Old Rape Victim?!"
Page D-12, Retractions, fine print: "Okay, so turns out last week's story was bullshit."
The thing that's frustrating is her response that she didn't lie, which is technically true. But she refuses to say that she was intentionally misleading.
No it doesn't. If she says a lie and someone else proves she's lying, then she's on the record for lying.
Why on Earth should it be important for journalists to get an admission? Did she change her ways? Are journalists going to stop publishing what she says? Is she going to be shunned from public life?
Lmao. She admits never mentioning the current age of the person who was trafficked at age 12.
So for anyone out there who needs this broken down. She brought up this example in her response to Biden's SOTU. But did not mention when it had happened, leaving viewers to figure that out on their own. The only time relevant context was that the fact that her speech was given in response to Biden.
She absolutely lied by omission but she's hoping people don't notice that. That they just go, "oh yeah it's on all those silly Democrats for assuming when she didn't say." And that they give no more thought to it because she yet again goes directly into that breathy fake concern voice about trafficking. At least this time she didn't graphically describe rape on national TV.
Hardly the first time we've heard a politician lie on national television. I'm old enough to remember "We can't let the smoking gun become a mushroom cloud", "I did not have sex with that woman", and (my personal favorite) "A few months ago I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and my best intentions tell me that's true, but the facts and evidence tell me it is not."
Its just so fucking funny to see people line up like a bunch of dime store marks to taste the latest batch of snake oil panacea.
Americans are the most propagandized people on the fucking Earth.
Oh I was a bit young to remember Reagan, but the other two... Fuck me I remember seeing "Mission Accomplished" on the one TV we had. Right after conducting a combat mission. And we didn't go home the next day either.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
During the Republican response to the State of the Union address on Thursday, Britt described a woman’s story of being “sex trafficked by the cartels starting at age 12” before saying, “President Biden’s border crisis is a disgrace.
In a detailed video posted on TikTok on Friday, freelance journalist Jonathan Katz tracked down what appears to be the story Britt referenced and found that it happened in Mexico in the mid-2000s.
“The Senators learned about cartel activity in Mexico and the work being done to rescue victims of human trafficking,” the press release said.
Jacinto has shared her story publicly, including in a 2015 hearing on sex trafficking held by the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Global Human Rights.
Britt has previously referenced the story she gave Thursday – including on Capitol Hill on September 27, 2023, according to her social media account.
White House spokesman Andrew Bates told CNN in a statement Sunday, “Instead of telling more debunked lies to justify opposing the toughest bipartisan border legislation in modern history, Senator Britt should stop choosing human smugglers and fentanyl traffickers over our national security and the Border Patrol Union.”
The original article contains 495 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Good bot. Thank you for not short-circuiting over GQP lies. You are resilient and we appreciate you.
You can undo this type of misinformation. Biden has plenty to criticize him for, and she had to make shit up. That is the GOP biggest strength, they can lie on TV and not get pushed back hard enough to undo the damage. Dems still treat them with too much basic respect.