this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
457 points (99.6% liked)

196

18188 readers
198 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
457
rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

plspls_pls_ stop calling each other fascists or astroturfers unless you have a thorough understanding of the uncommitted movement and what u.s. primaries are. there is so much blatant misunderstanding and misinfo going on it’s bad.

edit: if any loser dares call for an uncommitted vote in the general election? i will kick them in the balls (gender neutral) (in minecraft)

(page 3) 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Who is "calling" and "not calling" the uncommitted movement?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The uncommitted movement will, in fact, be called for the general election - by assholes who just want Biden to lose.

You can ignore them. But they will be there. And the mouth noises they make will be based on sincere and reasonable criticism.

The thing about objecting 'we can't do [blank] because conservatives will abuse it in bad faith' is, conservatives will absofuckinglutely abuse [blank] in bad faith. Probably whether or not we do it. That part of the objection is real - even if we should still do [blank]. We can only do [blank] in spite of them.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 1 year ago

It's so unfathomable to me to think you cannot send a message by having an opinion, only by using an indirect possible half message via an entirely different channel used for other things? It's crazy talking to think political officers don't understand or know what people ask for, but they will understand this? It's coming from ignorance or do people actually not understand?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›