this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
184 points (94.2% liked)

Linux

48072 readers
1 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How does it stack up against traditional package management and others like AUR and Nix?

(page 4) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cafuneandchill@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's alright

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 points 1 year ago

The picture is too big.

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I personally think it is trash..

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

What's not to Ike? These systems' development has been long overdue.

[–] 0485919158191@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago

I dont use insecure tools to install software

[–] Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are awesome but personally I don't use them. I have an obsession with memory management. Flatpak apps don't share libraries so they get chunky at times. This shouldn't be a problem for most people. It's a personal problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Finalsolo963@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 year ago

Everything I've gotten as a flatpak has been borked in one way or another. I only use it if there is literally no other option available.

[–] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space -2 points 1 year ago

It's a decent packaging solution.

regarding the sandboxing, all the negatives are present with none of the benefits, wish they'd just rip that shit out

if you want to run software you don't trust, firejail it or get it's snap

[–] kingmongoose7877@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

My totally unscientific opinion (with a double-your-money-back guarantee!):

I'm not crazy about either Flatpak or Snap for that matter as there's so much backend baggage for both as well as certain hurdles regarding privileges and access to the file system (somebody please correct me if I'm wrong or working with dated information.)

My other completely prejudiced, unfounded bias against Flatpak is that it appears to have been adopted by RedHat as "the one true way," and what with IBM's/RedHat's behaviour anti-FOSS behaviour lately, plus I've almost always have been an apt user, I find it a pill hard to swallow.

Me, say what you will about the security issues and its other flaws, but I like AppImage.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›