this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
36 points (92.9% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles (Moved to !electricvehicles@slrpnk.net)

3370 readers
1 users here now

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

ArchiveA community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

There are a dozen or more cars out there, crossovers and SUVs are what marketing tells them to make. That and dodging fuel efficiency requirements. Take a look at Fords entire lineup, EV and gas. The only car is the Mustang.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s what the market demands, for better or worse.

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It's what plants crave

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No it's what the makers offer

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And why do you think that is?

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Higher profit margin mostly.

A root factor was the CAFE standards excluded trucks so manufacturers built SUV's on truck chassis to comply, and then could put more pollution in them at lower cost, plus again, bigger profit margin.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If there wasn’t sufficient demand then profit margins mean little. Ultimately the driving factor is that SUVs and crossovers are what (American) consumers want. So that’s what is being built.

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Agree to disagree

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Ok, the R3 looks pretty rad. I’ll bet money that they’re targeting $39k. If they can manufacture in the US and go even lower, that would be impressive.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I want a bloody car. I hate that SUVs are the norm now.

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't get the hate for SUV's but I love them. Just put a deposit down on a Polestar 3.

  • they’re heavier, which negatively impacts efficiency in many respects
  • they’re physically larger and tend to be boxy, both of which induce substantially more aerodynamic drag, and had serious implications on pedestrian safety as well
  • all else being equal, they have a higher center of gravity, which impacts stability and driving dynamics when compared to cars