this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
371 points (96.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

9056 readers
1876 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ReadyUser31@lemmy.world
aeronmelon@lemmy.world
needanke@feddit.org
371
Iconic (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by nifty@lemmy.world to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JayDee@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

California does have the tallests mountain in the contiguous US. It sure as fuck isn't Mount Shasta.

Mount Whitney stands 14.5k feet tall, and it's way more fucking badass in Appearance.

Many of Colorado's mountain summits also stand taller than Shasta, and are multitudes more majestic in appearance.

As for iconic, the Appalachian mountains may not be known by individual name, they are the boy band of mountains in terms of fame in the US. Mount Washington is also extremely iconic. I hadn't even heard of Shasta till this post. St. Helens is also extremely well-known.

For those wondering, Denali is the tallest mountain in the US, as well as the tallest mountain on land in the world.

EDIT: so for clarification - Mount Everest is the highest mountain in the world, at close to 9k meters. When you measure it base-to-peak, however, Denali measures out at 5,486 meters, while Everest is only 5,200 meters.

Something notable is that though Denali is stated as the tallest mountain on land, it seems Rakaposhi in Pakistan has a base-to-peak measure of 6,000 meters. It also is the only mountain whose peak descends to base without interruption apparently.

EDIT 2:got my numbers mixed up, fixed some info.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Mt. Rainer in Washington is 14.4k and is one bad looking motherfucker as well.

[–] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Most glaciated in the lower 48 too 😎

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It claims mountaineer lives on the regular too. A few years ago two different climbers were lost on the mountain at the same time. I wondered how depressing it would be if they found each other, thinking they were saved, only to learn that the other person was lost too.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And we live in constant, vague fear of its inevitible eruption and our subsequent demise.

[–] weariedfae@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not just eruption, it is PRIMED for a total sector collapse like Mt. St. Helens.

And that is why I forced my friends to take a map of the lahar hazard zones with them when they were buying a house in Pierce County.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

lahar hazard zones

the Green river and Tacoma are FUCKED when that day comes

[–] weariedfae@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Oh for sure dude. It's gon' be BAAAAAD. The alarms in Orting might give them 5 minutes to run up the hill but downstream is still hosed.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Depending on how you define "base", Rakaposhi might be taller coming in at 19,357 ft.

[–] JayDee@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I had to pull out Google map's topographic view for this. From base camp to peak, Rakaposhi is only 4,300 meters.

However, if you measure from the Hunza river - which Rakaposhi directly descends all the way down to - the descent looks to be approximately 5,920 meters. That is interesting.

[–] Lemmeenym@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Thanks for mentioning the Appalachians. I'm going to geek out on them a little bit now. The Appalachians may not be as big now as the the Rockies but they were plenty big enough to hold up westward expansion for a couple hundred years. Why aren't they tall? Because they are old. Why aren't they as long as some other ranges? Because they are old.

How old? They began forming more than 1.2 billion years ago and peaked during the formation of Pangea 500-300 million years ago. Were they bigger? When Pangea was breaking up they were as tall as the Himalayas and the Alps are today. Longer? The Highlands of Scotland were part of the Appalachians, the Little Atlas mountains in Morocco were part of the Appalachians. At their longest they spanned 3 modern continents and acted as a continental divide for a Supercontinent.

What were animals doing when they were forming? Land animals didn't exist, sea animals were just beginning to evolve bones. Why is there so much coal under the Appalachians? The organisms that break down plant material didn't exist yet. Ancient forests (not modern tree based forests, trees didn't exist yet, liverworts, mosses, rhododendron, and ferns) were buried whole with no decomposition. All of the carbon held in those forests was trapped under a massive amount of earth for hundreds millions of years.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

I like tall mountains, but prominence is way more important to make a mountain seem special

[–] ObamaBinLaden@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was with you until you started talking about Denali. What do you mean by that?

[–] JayDee@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As I understand it, there are many weird aspects about measuring mountain height. From base to peak, Donali is 18k feet.

My overall understanding on how that is specifically determined is out of my understanding. I'm guessing other mountains which are taller have their bases in the ocean which puts them into a different 'category'. Denali just happens to be completely land-based.

[–] ObamaBinLaden@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My brother the entire Himalayas are land locked

[–] JayDee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I did look into it more. Everest has the highest peak, but when measured base to peak, is 200 meters shorter than Denali.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Mauna Kea is the tallest mountain in the world, if you ignore the water.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is like a short person who compensates by being aggressive? Mt Shasta, as noted, peaks at over 14k…. Mt St Helens only reaches around 8500.

[–] AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah... Now.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

For now.

[–] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Just continuing its pattern of being a hothead

[–] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The mountains in Washington double as volcanoes so they tend to talk a little more smack.

[–] Taniwha420@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Mt. Shasta is also a volcano, no?

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah but they don't know if it's active from what I've read.

That and Saint Helens kinda blew tf up outta nowhere.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Me after glancing at mont blanc from my window: yeah right guys

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Nice try but Mt Blanc isn't nearly as scenic or iconic. It's just an average peak on the range.

Or please go ahead and post a Pic from your window.

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

You’re just trying to troll OP into posting pics of his mountain

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It stands about twice as high as everything around it and it's capped with snow in the summer too (hence the name), it's iconic af

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Not only is it very pretty by itself and impressive to look at, but also, ya know, it's in the Alps, so everything around it is just as pretty.

[–] GrymEdm@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Pure glory?! You can talk about pure glory after you get on my level and cause at least 1 billion in damages."

[–] Hope@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Best I can do is a crummy soda brand: A crate of Shasta Cola

[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago

Not only do I hope this is real - to me this is what twitter should be about. just witty/shitty... shwitty? comments. like when facebook used to actually be seeing your friends pages, and not endless scrolling of 85% ads.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

14k what?

[–] YerbaYerba@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think they are referring to the elevation in feet.

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ah dicks times hotdogs

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

I thought that was the formula for converting Celsius to Frankfurter?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Mt. Rainier says hi.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Man, mountain beef is the best beef

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Does that mean beef you eat on a mountain? How much beef can one carry up a mountain?

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I mean beef (as in fighting) between mountains, but that is a good question! If you bring the cow up alive you'll manage to transport quite a lot of beef. The best part is that the conditions may be freezing, and as such you can technically keep your beef there for a long while too.

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Spoken like someone who likes to blow its load everywhere.

[–] callmepk@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

♪ Mount St. Helens is about to blow up ♪

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago