this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
70 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

74438 readers
2220 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Futurism report highlights the reputational cost of publishing AI-generated content.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Toes@ani.social 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

CNET has been spam for a long time

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Any news site using Chatbots to right their articles should not be trusted.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago

Wait.. is Wikipedia publishing original research?!?!??!

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Are these the people behind #1 malware site download.com? lmao should've been done ages ago

[–] drawerair@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I learned that Wikipedia has a "reliable sources" table thanks to this. I'll check it out.

I can't recall a time when I went to Cnet to read re tech. I get tech stuff from Youtube and Verge.

The Wikipedia folks didn't demote Cnet after 1 week of discussion. Not 1 month. Not 6 months. Were they giving Cnet time to change for the better?