chapotraphouse

13473 readers

1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Todo rompen, todo (hexbear.net)

submitted 2 years ago by RNAi@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Deeply unserious" is an actionable threat, after all

[–] MemesAreTheory@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

Deeply unserious people belong in seriously deep places barbara-pit

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago

Fuckin EVERYONE stealing our goddamn words, coming up with this shit ain't easy, English is dogshit at making pithy terms

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago

I don't think it will catch on, "ontologically" is too long for the average cracker.

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I think I'm going to go with.. "ontologically evil".

Nevermind! I'm going with "phenomenologically evil"!

Final answer.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Dialectically evil.

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

Damn, that's a good one.

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago

Up next, epistemologically evil.