this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
36 points (100.0% liked)

Tree Huggers

882 readers
14 users here now

A community to discuss, appreciate, and advocate for trees and forests. Please follow the SLRPNK instance rules, found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Our research calculated the death rates of urban inhabitants across 93 European cities between June and August 2015.

In 2015, Gothenburg in Sweden recorded no premature UHI deaths, while urban heat was responsible for 32 premature deaths per 100,000 people in the Romanian city Cluj-Napoca.

Tree planting programmes must therefore encourage residents to plant trees.

So increasing tree cover to 30% may be challenging for some European cities.

Incorporating urban green infrastructure into cities should make them more resilient to climate change.

Preserving existing trees and complementing tree planting schemes with other measures that reduce the intensity of UHIs, such as reducing car use, are similarly important.

Our study suggests that by increasing tree coverage, premature UHI deaths in European cities can be reduced.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Green and sustainability is good? Who woulda thought?

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How can Sweden be compared to Romania?

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago

You make a table with three columns. In the first column, you collect criteria you want to compare on. In the second column you put the values for the criteria as fulfilled by "Sweden". In the third column you put the values for the criteria as fulfilled by "Romania". Preferably you put good headings in the first line (like "Sweden" for the column with the values for "Sweden" and "Romania" in the column with the values for "Romania").

That's how you compare Sweden to Romania.

Can I help you any further?

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unfortunately it's also a bit too late to just plant them. Thanks to the regular drought it got quite challenging keeping them alive. Not to mention that it takes 10 years or more of good growth to be noticable.

[–] Treevan@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago

Not in the (sub)tropics though. We can get 2m in a few months.

But yeah, you're right, the change in climate change can make growing them harder. Redesigned rain gutters into tree pits, structural soils, biochar, species selection from a wider climatic range, advanced stock, etc, could be techniques to make it a little easier and more noticeable quicker.

Urban forester is going to be a tough job going into the future but it's an important challenge. I did it and loved it, but our local Council really dropped the ball on it unfortunately. We just came off a La Nina with 3 years of record rainfalls, barely a tree went in. You watch them struggle to plant a heap in the worst drought of our lifetimes.