this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

Tree Huggers

882 readers
13 users here now

A community to discuss, appreciate, and advocate for trees and forests. Please follow the SLRPNK instance rules, found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Conventional residential development destroys large amounts of green space.

The loss of urban green space leads to increases in urban heat and flooding, which are amplified by climate change, and can threaten human health and well-being, and property.

Urban flooding due to increasingly severe storms can be reduced through well-designed green infrastructure, including green spaces.

Although many Canadians consider a detached house to be their dream home, conventional residential development may worsen climate change.

These climate change mitigation benefits are reduced when urban trees and green spaces are removed.

While improved green spaces may generate small premiums for environmentally oriented home buyers, land developers are not compensated for the public goods these green spaces provide.

Cities need new ideas that go beyond green infrastructure checklists that incentivize developers only to fulfil minimum expectations and do not take the future climate change performance of these natural assets into consideration.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago

Due to the severe housing shortage caused by decades of population growth combined with resistance to higher-density development, we will likely see a large increase in housing construction in the coming years. I am interested in seeing what standards of design can allow for affordable housing as well as high tree canopy coverage. What rules encourage preservation of existing trees while ensuring new designs and plantings will reach sufficient levels of greenery in the future, without increasing housing costs?