Programmer Humor

32410 readers

1 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

cat_programmer@lemmy.ml

280

You have the right to remain silent (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 years ago by aggelalex@lemmy.world to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] P1r4nha@feddit.de 29 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Horrible code. First, it doesn't compile because there's no ; at the end of the class definition.

And then more importantly you have a private destructor which means this CriminalScum's destructor will never be called, so you can't charge it with distruction either. Or are you telling me this CriminalScum has friends?

[–] aggelalex@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

There's always an accomplice in crime.

Also, tall order to expect me to run and test a code written only for a shitpost.

[–] P1r4nha@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago

You're charging the class for a thought crime!!

[–] observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also, if I'm not mistaken the uninitialized prop is not guaranteed to be nullptr here, so this private destructor could be trying to free from some random pointer.

[+] RagingHungryPanda@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] P1r4nha@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yep, variables that are merely declared are not initialized, so their value is not guaranteed. Could be anything.

[–] waz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure some compiler settings can change this. I have a fuzzy memory of a bug that went away when compiled with debug flags enabled and the difference was that unassigned variables were being zeroed vs not zeroed.

[–] P1r4nha@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

Yes, actually at my job a co-worker just found exactly such a bug yesterday: Debug build zeroed out the variable and the release build didn't. So the bug only occurred in the release build, but could not be reproduced on the debug build where the developers work on. So in the end he found it because of the different compiler flags used for debug vs release builds at our work place.

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's my property tho

[–] Jordan_U@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

this

[–] Hupf@feddit.de 15 points 2 years ago

CriminalScrum

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

it’s not monospaced; my eyes

[–] aggelalex@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Peak shittiness requires sacrifice

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

STOP! You have violated the law. Pay the court a fine or serve your sentence. Your stolen goods are now forfeit.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 9 points 2 years ago

Right to remain silent isn't granted to criminal scum, they have to either pay the court a fine or serve their sentence, and their stolen goods are now forfeit.

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

I see there an access violation...