this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
260 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

74519 readers
3589 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to shareholder letters, Rivian plans to allow charging of electric vehicles of other brands in the second half of the year.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 98 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Could you imagine having to fill up on gas driving to a specific gas station designed for your make/brand of car.

Hey honey, going out to fill up the car at the local Subaru Gas Station.

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 57 points 2 years ago

Car companies have definitely imagined this. And if they could, they 100% would.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 49 points 2 years ago (1 children)

this is why leaving infrastructure to private manufacturers is insane.

standardize this shit.

[–] gaifux@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well that's ironic, because it is being left to private manufacturers, and they are moving towards interoperability anyways

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

the are allowing it because they dragged us along until they noticed they don't have a choice now. its important to realize they can always rescind it when they feel like enshittifying.

[–] ___@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Right. Occasionally, regulation can speed up an industry by preventing this kind of thing. If that had happened, however, we would likely be stuck with the bulkier CCS chargers.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

its about interoperability and fairness. speeding it up is a nice bonus.

how bulky chargers are is irrelevant. forcing manufactirers to standardize and interoperate is the point.

i said nothing about how it should be regulated, only who should be managing the system. letting corpos do whatever they want is never the answer.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 years ago

The elitism between the Chevy, RAM, and Ford gas stations would be hilarious though. Meanwhile the Toyotabros would be dunkin on them.

[–] onion@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago

Well you see Mercedes has a star-shaped nozzle and Ford has a square shaped nozzle and...

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Do they use NACS or a different style connection?

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They're moving to NACS going forwards, but the current fleet and network uses the J1772 plug and CCS like basically everyone else up until now.

[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Rivian hasn't yet adopted NACS, these are CCS.

[–] shani66@ani.social 14 points 2 years ago

This is why we pay the CEOs the big bucks; to make the most obvious decisions out there.