AntiTrumpAlliance

Wow, way to like, headline with the exact opposite of what the content of the article actually says. Anything for a misogynist jab eh?

The article actually says:

“Overall, the current manuscript offers no substantive support to the first study of Navarrete et al. (2010). We were unable to replicate their key finding… Rather, our results suggest that women’s perception of the candidates’ intelligence, and their own personalities, have some relationship to their stated voting preferences,” the researchers concluded. “Although the comparability of our findings must be considered in light of the impossibility of a direct replication of the original, we contend that hormonal changes across the menstrual cycle are unlikely to tip the scale for female voters.”