this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
379 points (90.4% liked)

Web Comics

1072 readers
1 users here now

founded 4 years ago
 

I had someone steel this and change “butts” to “Christian” and weirdly enough, lengthen my skirt. Kept the flame boots, but no short skirts.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] navitux@lemmy.world 77 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] asphaltkooky@lemmy.world 57 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sir please don't edge the dog.

[–] pythonoob@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

The dog has already edged.

[–] BitterSweet@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

~ edge all of the good boys ~

[–] Repossess6855@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

💀 lmao thanks for the new reaction pic

[–] MrMonkey@lemm.ee 44 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Too many people would change their minds based on what the sign says.

Does you reaction change if the sign read: "Black Lives Matter" or if it read "Back the Blue"?

Or one that says "Trans women are women" vs "trans women aren't women"?

Or "pineapple on pizza is ok" vs "pinapple on pizza is the work of the devil"?

[–] koorool@feddit.de 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We must not be tolerant to intolerance is the basis for me.

[–] reverendz@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] button_masher@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Thank you for that. Really informative and a fun read.

[–] SneakyWeasel@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Honestly, the first thing that I thought about was what if the sign had a slur word. Sure freedom of speech means say what you wanna say, that doesn't mean people aren't gonna sock you in the face.

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The problem with free speech is probs that what people are really fighting over is who gets to control and define what "free" speech is. Only in an anarchist society would free speech really be as you described - say what you want, but be prepared to face the consequences of your words (and actions). Without the protection of government and socio/economic hierarchies, bigots wouldn't feel quite as invincible while they spew hate and oppression.

[–] NightAuthor@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think I’m still of the mind that “intent to incite violence” is the line. And even that can be crossed when the government needs to be overthrown.

But I could be convinced otherwise

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Violence is extremely useful and will be the only tool you have left if you want to stop climate change or protect yourself+your social network from the effects of capitalism.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Stephen Fry on being offended.

Note, Mr Fry is a gay man and has championed gay rights. His very existence is offensive to backwards conservatives. This quote often gets shared without any context.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago

what year is this, 2015?

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That’s hysterical!

Of course they had to lengthen the skirt 😂

[–] lightsecond@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 7 points 2 years ago (29 children)

Let's replace the word with "N*****" and see if you still feel clever

[–] Numuruzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The point still stands, in the minutiae you're addressing. People post absolute garbage opinions on a regular basis, and are free to do so, as long as their platform allows it. This doesn't go into the consequences of pissing off a lot of people, but you're still free to do it.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The point does not stand. I don't think any set of rules that sees "N***** N***** N*****" as acceptable speech should be respected, nor any person who thinks that way.

[–] Numuruzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I agree with the spirit, but I disagree with what the point of the comic is - it's not trying to make a point about respect per se, just about freedom of speech. Even if you wouldn't be a part of a community that allows hate speech, if you encounter it "in the street" so to speak - there's just nothing you can do.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Let's replace some of the words in your comment to "I am a pooopoo head and I eat poopoo", and see how do you feel then. Bet pretty stupid, huh?

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago

Excellent rebuttal.

[–] richyawyingtmv@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Real life footage of this actually happening, and the result: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8DJGw3rIwI

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

Have always enjoyed your comics, funny story.

[–] Rootiest@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

That is an awesome name for a comic, I love it.

load more comments
view more: next ›